Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29086522›Full record

Trial reportObesity (Silver Spring, Md.)2017

A Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Study of Technology-Based Weight Loss Interventions among Endometrial Cancer Survivors.

Ashley F Haggerty, Andrea Hagemann, Matthew Barnett, Mark Thornquist, Marian L Neuhouser, Neil Horowitz, Graham A Colditz, David B Sarwer, Emily M Ko, Kelly C Allison

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04855552 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Telehealth Weight Loss Program for Breast Cancer Survivors

TypeinterventionalSponsorAbramson Cancer Center at Penn MedicineRan2021 to 2027Enrolled22ConditionsCancer Survivors, Cancer of Breast, Body Weight, Overweight and ObesityArmsBehavioral Weight-loss Program Via Telehealth, Behavioral Weight-Loss Program Via Telehealth - Weight Measures, Validated Surveys of Patient-Reported Outcomes
NCT05194722 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Optimizing Implementation of Mental Health Intervention Within Orthopedic Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2022 to 2022Enrolled30ConditionsAnxiety, Depression, Back Pain, Neck PainArmsWysa mobile app
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Perceptions, facilitators, and barriers of participation for a behavioral weight loss group-based telehealth program for breast cancer survivors: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ashley F HaggertyAbramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7064-3189
Andrea HagemannSiteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Matthew BarnettFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Mark ThornquistFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Marian L NeuhouserFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Neil HorowitzDana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Graham A ColditzSiteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
David B SarwerCollege of Public Health and Center for Obesity Research and Education, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Emily M KoAbramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Kelly C AllisonDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USWashington University in St. Louis · USHarvard University · USTemple University · US

Funding

Washington University Center for Cellular ImagingP30CA091842 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TIMOTHY J. EBERLEIN · 2001 to 2026
$128.0M
TREC Coordination CenterU01CA116850 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI THORNQUIST, MARK · 2005 to 2016
$13.3M
Sleep Duration, Childhood Energy Balance, and Insulin Resistance in AdolescenceU54CA155626 · NCI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI STAMPFER, MEIR · 2011 to 2015
$9.6M
The Women In Steady Exercise Research (WISER) SurwVor TrialU54CA155850 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SCHMITZ, KATHRYN H. · 2011 to 2015
$9.1M
Worksite Policies and neighborhood Influences on Obesity and Cancer RiskU54CA155496 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI COLDITZ, GRAHAM A. · 2011 to 2016
$9.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA091842NCI NIH HHS U01 CA116850NCI NIH HHS U54 CA155496NCI NIH HHS U54 CA155626NCI NIH HHS U54 CA155850
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to test the efficacy of technology-based weight loss interventions for endometrial cancer (EC) survivors with obesity.

methodsEC survivors with obesity (n = 196) from three medical centers completed assessments for knowledge of obesity as a risk for EC and interest in weight management. Forty-one women were randomized to a 6-month intervention: telemedicine with Wi-Fi scales, text messaging (texting), or enhanced usual care (EUC). Changes in anthropometrics and psychosocial measures were analyzed.

resultsOne-third of survey participants lacked awareness that obesity increased the risk of EC, and 40% misclassified their body mass. There were no significant differences in weight loss across interventions (mean = -4.4 kg, SD = 6.5 kg). Telemedicine showed improvements in physical health and cancer-related body image (Ps = 0.04) compared to texting and in sexual functioning compared to EUC (P = 0.03). Total physical activity was increased in EUC compared with telemedicine (P = 0.01), and vigorous physical activity was increased in EUC compared with both interventions (P = 0.01-0.03); walking significantly increased in texting compared with telemedicine (P = 0.02).

conclusionsTechnology-based lifestyle interventions in EC survivors with obesity were accessible and resulted in weight loss and improved quality of life. EUC also produced weight loss, demonstrating a potential for beginning weight management with information on specific diet and exercise goals.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeTelemedicineWeight LossCancer SurvivorsEndometrial NeoplasmsExerciseFemaleHumansLife StyleMiddle AgedObesityTreatment OutcomeUnited States

Identifiers

PMID29086522
PMCPMC6743497
OpenAlexW2767476156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.