ArticleHuman brain mapping2018
Reliability of an fMRI paradigm for emotional processing in a multisite longitudinal study: Clarification and implications for statistical power.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A decade of test-retest reliability of functional connectivity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.NeuroImage · 2019Pooled it
- Investigative Approaches to Resilient Emotion Regulation Neurodevelopment in a South African Birth Cohort.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2025Article
- Reliability and stability challenges in ABCD task fMRI data.NeuroImage · 2022Article
- Validating Biobehavioral Technologies for Use in Clinical Psychiatry.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- Toward Leveraging Human Connectomic Data in Large Consortia: Generalizability of fMRI-Based Brain Graphs Across Sites, Sessions, and Paradigms.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2019Article
- Acute alcohol administration dampens central extended amygdala reactivity.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Roadmap for optimizing the clinical utility of emotional stress paradigms in human neuroimaging research.Neurobiology of stress · 2018Review
- Reliability of an fMRI paradigm for emotional processing in a multisite longitudinal study: Clarification and implications for statistical power.Human brain mapping · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this commentary, we clarify the meaning of the generalizability-theory-based coefficients reported in our multisite reliability study of fMRI measures of regional brain activation during an emotion processing task (Gee et al., Human Brain Mapping 2015;36:2558-2579). While the original paper reported generalizability and dependability coefficients based on the design of our traveling subjects study (in which each subject was scanned twice at each of eight sites), those coefficients are of limited applicability outside of the reliability study context. Here we report generalizability and dependability coefficients that represent the reliability one can expect for a multisite study, in which a given subject is scanned once on a scanner drawn randomly from the pool of available scanners (i.e., analogous to the more typical multisite study design). We also characterize the implications of a multisite versus single-site study design for statistical power, including Figure 1 that shows sample size requirements to detect activation in two key nodes of the emotion processing circuitry given observed differences in reliability of measurement between single-site and multisite designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.