Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29086349›Full record

ReviewDrugs & aging2017

Targeted Therapies in the Management of Ovarian Cancer: A Focus on Older Patients.

Caroline Lum, Christopher B Steer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs & aging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Caroline LumBorder Medical Oncology, Albury Wodonga Regional Cancer Centre, 201-239 Borella Rd, Albury, NSW, 2640, Australia.
Christopher B SteerBorder Medical Oncology, Albury Wodonga Regional Cancer Centre, 201-239 Borella Rd, Albury, NSW, 2640, Australia. csteer@bordermedonc.com.au.ORCID 0000-0002-7677-3339

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is one of the most common gynaecological malignancies and one of the leading causes of cancer mortality in women. The standard of care for ovarian cancer is maximal de-bulking surgery followed by adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. The median age at diagnosis is 63 years, yet older patients are under-represented in clinical trials. Historically, 65 years of age has been used as a definition of elderly; however, such an age cut-off encompasses a highly heterogeneous population with regards to comorbidity, functional status, and cognition. New targeted therapies are emerging in the treatment of ovarian cancer, with the most experience being with bevacizumab and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. These agents have led to significant improvements in progression-free survival in selected trial populations. Whilst evidence for the use of these agents in older women is limited, there appears to be no signal for any difference in efficacy. The potential risk of increased toxicity in older adults with comorbidities is explored using the data available. More evidence is needed in the application of newer targeted therapies in older women with ovarian cancer, and improved accrual of older patients to clinical trials is required.

Indexed as

AdultBevacizumabChemotherapy, AdjuvantClinical Trials as TopicDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansImmunotherapyMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsPoly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorBevacizumabPARP1 protein, humanPoly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.