Observational studyJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2018
Initiation of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for venous thromboembolism: impact on time to hospital discharge.
Observational study in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Comparison of efficacy and safety between new oral anticoagulants and traditional anticoagulants in patients with liver cirrhosis requiring anticoagulant therapy].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2022Pooled it
- The Length of Hospital Stay of Patients with Venous Thromboembolism: A Cross-Sectional Study from Jordan.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Article
- Safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus traditional anticoagulants in venous thromboembolism.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2019Review
- Hospital length of stay in patients initiated on direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for venous thromboembolism: a real-world single-center study.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this project was to compare the time from initiation of oral anticoagulation to hospital discharge between warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE). This retrospective observational study was done at a single VA medical center. A total of 107 patients were included, with 42 patients (39%) in the DOAC group, which included rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and apixaban, and 65 patients (61%) in the warfarin group. Variables collected through chart review included comorbid conditions, time from initiation of oral anticoagulation to discharge, emergency department (ED) visits and readmission within 30 or 90 days, and bleeding events. The DOAC group had a shorter time to discharge compared to the warfarin group (28 vs. 114 h, p < 0.001). There were similar 30 and 90-day hospital readmission rates and/or ED visits for DOACs (23.8 and 33.3%) compared to warfarin (18.5 and 30.8%), including those related to bleeding of any severity (11.9% for DOACs vs. 9.2% for warfarin; p = 0.75). There was one major bleeding event in the DOAC group and two in the warfarin group. The use of DOACs for the treatment of acute VTE in hospitalized patients was associated with shorter time to hospital discharge when compared to warfarin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.