Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29086051›Full record

ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2017

Electronic lab notebooks: can they replace paper?

Samantha Kanza, Cerys Willoughby, Nicholas Gibbins, Richard Whitby, Jeremy Graham Frey, Jana Erjavec, Klemen Zupančič, Matjaž Hren, Katarina Kovač

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Simple User-Friendly Reaction Format.Molecular informatics · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. AI4Green: An Open-Source ELN for Green and Sustainable Chemistry.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Implementing an institution-wide electronic lab notebook initiative.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. The AI for Scientific Discovery NetworkPatterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Samantha KanzaUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, UK. sk11g08@soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4831-9489
Cerys WilloughbyUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Nicholas GibbinsUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Richard WhitbyUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Jeremy Graham FreyUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Jana ErjavecBioSistemika, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Klemen ZupančičBioSistemika, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Matjaž HrenBioSistemika, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Katarina KovačBioSistemika, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the increasingly digital nature of society there are some areas of research that remain firmly rooted in the past; in this case the laboratory notebook, the last remaining paper component of an experiment. Countless electronic laboratory notebooks (ELNs) have been created in an attempt to digitise record keeping processes in the lab, but none of them have become a 'key player' in the ELN market, due to the many adoption barriers that have been identified in previous research and further explored in the user studies presented here. The main issues identified are the cost of the current available ELNs, their ease of use (or lack of it) and their accessibility issues across different devices and operating systems. Evidence suggests that whilst scientists willingly make use of generic notebooking software, spreadsheets and other general office and scientific tools to aid their work, current ELNs are lacking in the required functionality to meet the needs of the researchers. In this paper we present our extensive research and user study results to propose an ELN built upon a pre-existing cloud notebook platform that makes use of accessible popular scientific software and semantic web technologies to help overcome the identified barriers to adoption.

Indexed as

CloudElectronic lab notebooks (ELNs)Notebooking softwareScientific softwareSemantic web

Identifiers

PMID29086051
PMCPMC5443717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.