Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29086041›Full record

ReviewMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2017

Primary tumor resection in stage IV unresectable colorectal cancer: what has changed?

Michał Pędziwiatr, Magdalena Mizera, Jan Witowski, Piotr Major, Grzegorz Torbicz, Natalia Gajewska, Andrzej Budzyński

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. InoperableMolecular and clinical oncology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Does primary tumor resection contribute to overall survival in unresectable synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer?Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michał Pędziwiatr2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kopernika 21, Kraków, Poland. michal.pedziwiatr@uj.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9073-2667
Magdalena Mizera2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kopernika 21, Kraków, Poland.
Jan Witowski2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kopernika 21, Kraków, Poland.
Piotr Major2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kopernika 21, Kraków, Poland.
Grzegorz Torbicz2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kopernika 21, Kraków, Poland.
Natalia Gajewska2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kopernika 21, Kraków, Poland.
Andrzej Budzyński2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kopernika 21, Kraków, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most current guidelines do not recommend primary tumor resection in stage IV unresectable colorectal cancer. Rapid chemotherapy development over the last decade has substantially changed the decision making. However, results of recently published trials and meta-analyses suggest that primary tumor resection may in fact be beneficial, principally in terms of prolonged survival. Additional factors, such as use of minimally invasive approach or protocols of enhanced recovery after surgery, affect clinical outcomes as well, but are often neglected when discussing the state of the art in this area. There are still no randomized studies determining the legitimacy of upfront surgery in asymptomatic patients. Also, quality of life also plays an important role in choosing appropriate treatment. Having said that, there is no data that would prove whether primary tumor resection has an advantage on that issue. With all the uncertainty, currently decision making in unresectable stage IV colorectal cancer is primarily up to clinicians' knowledge, common sense and patients' preferences.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPostoperative ComplicationsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRectumDecision makingPrimary tumor resectionStage IV colorectal cancerUnresectable colorectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID29086041
PMCPMC5662673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.