Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29085980›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2018

Psilocybin with psychological support improves emotional face recognition in treatment-resistant depression.

J B Stroud, T P Freeman, R Leech, C Hindocha, W Lawn, D J Nutt, H V Curran, R L Carhart-Harris

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of psilocybin on cognitive function: A systematic review.Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Emergence of Psilocybin in Psychiatry and Neuroscience.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  14. Psychedelic enhancement of flexible learning weeks after a single dose.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Psychedelics, epilepsy, and seizures: a review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

J B StroudPsychedelic Research Group, Neuropsychopharmacology Unit, Centre for Academic Psychiatry, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK. jack.stroud.16@alumni.ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8534-4491
T P FreemanClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, University College London, London, UK.
R LeechComputational, Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
C HindochaClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, University College London, London, UK.
W LawnClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, University College London, London, UK.
D J NuttPsychedelic Research Group, Neuropsychopharmacology Unit, Centre for Academic Psychiatry, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
H V CurranClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, University College London, London, UK.
R L Carhart-HarrisPsychedelic Research Group, Neuropsychopharmacology Unit, Centre for Academic Psychiatry, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Imperial College London · GBUniversity College London · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity College Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/J00460X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleDepressed patients robustly exhibit affective biases in emotional processing which are altered by SSRIs and predict clinical outcome.

objectivesThe objective of this study is to investigate whether psilocybin, recently shown to rapidly improve mood in treatment-resistant depression (TRD), alters patients' emotional processing biases.

methodsSeventeen patients with treatment-resistant depression completed a dynamic emotional face recognition task at baseline and 1 month later after two doses of psilocybin with psychological support. Sixteen controls completed the emotional recognition task over the same time frame but did not receive psilocybin.

resultsWe found evidence for a group × time interaction on speed of emotion recognition (p = .035). At baseline, patients were slower at recognising facial emotions compared with controls (p < .001). After psilocybin, this difference was remediated (p = .208). Emotion recognition was faster at follow-up compared with baseline in patients (p = .004, d = .876) but not controls (p = .263, d = .302). In patients, this change was significantly correlated with a reduction in anhedonia over the same time period (r = .640, p = .010).

conclusionsPsilocybin with psychological support appears to improve processing of emotional faces in treatment-resistant depression, and this correlates with reduced anhedonia. Placebo-controlled studies are warranted to follow up these preliminary findings.

Indexed as

Psychosocial Support SystemsAdultDepressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantEmotionsFacial ExpressionFacial RecognitionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHallucinogensHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPsilocybinTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultHallucinogensPsilocybinAnhedoniaEmotional face recognitionPsilocybinTreatment-resistant depression

Identifiers

PMID29085980
PMCPMC5813058
OpenAlexW2767171514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.