Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29085978›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2018

Outcome and prognostic factors in single brain metastases from small-cell lung cancer.

Denise Bernhardt, Sebastian Adeberg, Farastuk Bozorgmehr, Nils Opfermann, Juliane Hörner-Rieber, Laila König, Jutta Kappes, Michael Thomas, Andreas Unterberg, Felix Herth and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Best Supportive CareFrontiers in oncology · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Denise BernhardtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, INF 400, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. denise.bernhardt@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID 0000-0001-5231-9097
Sebastian AdebergDepartment of Radiation Oncology, INF 400, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Farastuk BozorgmehrDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik, Translational Lung Research Centre Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Nils OpfermannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, INF 400, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Juliane Hörner-RieberDepartment of Radiation Oncology, INF 400, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Laila KönigDepartment of Radiation Oncology, INF 400, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jutta KappesDepartment of Pneumology, Thoraxklinik, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael ThomasDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik, Translational Lung Research Centre Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Andreas UnterbergDepartment of Neurosurgery, INF 400, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Felix HerthDepartment of Pneumology, Thoraxklinik, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Claus Peter HeußelTranslational Lung Research Centre Heidelberg (TLRC-H), German Centre for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany.
Arne WarthTranslational Lung Research Centre Heidelberg (TLRC-H), German Centre for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany.
Jürgen DebusDepartment of Radiation Oncology, INF 400, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Martin SteinsDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik, Translational Lung Research Centre Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Stefan RiekenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, INF 400, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWhole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) is historically the standard of care for patients with brain metastases (BM) from small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), although locally ablative treatments are the standard of care for patients with 1-4 BM from other solid tumors. The objective of this analysis was to find prognostic factors influencing overall survival (OS) and intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) in SCLC patients with single BM (SBM) treated with WBRT.

methodsA total of 52 patients were identified in the authors' cancer center database with histologically confirmed SCLC and contrast-enhanced magnet resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT), which confirmed SBM between 2006 and 2015 and were therefore treated with WBRT. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed for OS analyses. The log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test was used to compare survival curves. Univariate Cox proportional-hazards ratios (HRs) were used to assess the influence of cofactors on OS and iPFS.

resultsThe median OS after WBRT was 5 months and the median iPFS after WBRT 16 months. Patients that received surgery prior to WBRT had a significantly longer median OS of 19 months compared to 5 months in the group receiving only WBRT (p = 0.03; HR 2.24; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-4.73). Patients with synchronous disease had a significantly longer OS compared to patients with metachronous BM (6 months vs. 3 months, p = 0.005; HR 0.27; 95% CI 0.11-0.68). Univariate analysis for OS revealed a statistically significant effect for metachronous disease (HR 2.25; 95% CI 1.14-4.46; p = 0.019), initial response to first-line chemotherapy (HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.35-0.97; p = 0.04), and surgical resection (HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.15-0.88; p = 0.026). OS was significantly affected by metachronous disease in multivariate analysis (HR 2.20; 95% CI 1.09-4.45; p = 0.028).

conclusionsUnivariate analysis revealed that surgery followed by WBRT can improve OS in patients with SBM in SCLC. Furthermore, synchronous disease and response to initial chemotherapy appeared to be major prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis revealed metachronous disease as a significantly negative prognostic factor on OS. The value of WBRT, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), or surgery alone or in combination for patients with a limited number of BM in SCLC should be evaluated in further prospective clinical trials.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Small CellCranial IrradiationDisease-Free SurvivalDose Fractionation, RadiationFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisTomography, X-Ray ComputedCranial irradiationSmall cell lung cancerSolitary brain metastasisSurvivalWBRT

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.