Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29085957›Full record

Trial reportOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2018

Teriparatide for treatment of patients with bisphosphonate-associated atypical fracture of the femur.

S L Greenspan, K Vujevich, C Britton, A Herradura, G Gruen, I Tarkin, P Siska, B Hamlin, S Perera

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Effectiveness of parathyroid hormone (PTH) analogues on fracture healing: a meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Advances in Parathyroid Hormone-based medicines.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The clinician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Progression of atypical femur stress fracture after discontinuation of bisphosphonate therapy.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S L GreenspanDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1110 Kaufmann Medical Building, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. greenspn@pitt.edu.
K VujevichDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1110 Kaufmann Medical Building, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
C BrittonDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Physicians, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
A HerraduraDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Physicians, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
G GruenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Physicians, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
I TarkinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Physicians, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
P SiskaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Physicians, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
B HamlinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Physicians, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
S PereraDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1110 Kaufmann Medical Building, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

VARIABILITY, STABILITY & SMOOTHNESS OF WALKINGP30AG024827 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Caterina Rosano · 2004 to 2026
$28.6M
Long-Term Care Research NetworkK07AG052668 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI GREENSPAN, SUSAN L · 2016 to 2020
$439k
NIA NIH HHS K07 AG052668NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024827
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Fracture Improvement with Teriparatide (Fix-IT) study randomized 13 women with an atypical femur fracture to immediate vs delayed teriparatide therapy; all were followed for 12 months. Results suggested a trend for superior healing and lesser bone mineral density declines in the immediate vs delayed group with no differences in adverse events. PURPOSE: Little clinical data are available on the use of teriparatide for the treatment of bisphosphonate-associated atypical femur fractures (AFF). The goal of the Fix-IT study was to determine if immediate therapy with teriparatide was superior for fracture healing after an AFF compared to a 6-month delay in teriparatide therapy.

methodsThis randomized pilot clinical trial included 13 women with an AFF who were randomized to immediate teriparatide vs a delay of 6 months. All were followed for 12 months on teriparatide. The primary outcomes included individual and composite measures of radiologic bone healing (scored 1 point [no healing] to 4 points [complete healing]) at 6 and 12 months. Secondary outcomes included bone mineral density of the unfractured contralateral hip, spine, 1/3 distal radius, and adverse events.

resultsWe found there was a trend for superior healing with the composite score (12.6 vs 11.2 at 6 months and 15.4 vs 13.2 at 12 months), and lesser bone mineral density declines at the 1/3 distal radius (12-month change - 1.9 vs - 6.1%) in the immediate vs the delayed group. There were no differences in adverse events. There was one implant failure in the delayed group.

conclusionsThere is a preliminary signal for greater improvements with immediate teriparatide therapy vs delayed therapy. However, because an AFF is a rare event, and only a small number of patients were included, the results must be interpreted with caution.

Indexed as

AgedBone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsDiphosphonatesDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFemoral FracturesFracture HealingFractures, SpontaneousHumansOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalPilot ProjectsRadiographyTeriparatideTreatment OutcomeBone Density Conservation AgentsDiphosphonatesTeriparatideAtypical femur fractureBisphosphonateBone mineral densityOsteoporosisTeriparatide

Identifiers

PMID29085957
PMCPMC6468986
OpenAlexW2765099878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.