Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29085771›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in chemical engineering2017

The Diverse Roles of Hydrogel Mechanics in Injectable Stem Cell Transplantation.

Abbygail A Foster, Laura M Marquardt, Sarah C Heilshorn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in chemical engineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Abbygail A FosterDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Laura M MarquardtDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Sarah C HeilshornDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.

Funding

T32 Training Program in Mechanisms and Innovation in Vascular DiseaseT32HL098049 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Nicholas James Leeper, Philip S Tsao · 2010 to 2026
$6.3M
Injectable Hydrogels to Improve the Efficacy of iPSC-derived TherapiesR21EB020235 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HEILSHORN, SARAH C, HUANG, NGAN F. · 2015 to 2016
$433k
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL098049NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB020235
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stem cell delivery by local injection has tremendous potential as a regenerative therapy but has seen limited clinical success. Several mechanical challenges hinder therapeutic efficacy throughout all stages of cell transplantation, including mechanical forces during injection and loss of mechanical support post-injection. Recent studies have begun exploring the use of biomaterials, in particular hydrogels, to enhance stem cell transplantation by addressing the often-conflicting mechanical requirements associated with each stage of the transplantation process. This review explores recent biomaterial approaches to improve the therapeutic efficacy of stem cells delivered through local injection, with a focus on strategies that specifically address the mechanical challenges that result in cell death and/or limit therapeutic function throughout the stages of transplantation.

Identifiers

PMID29085771
PMCPMC5659597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.