Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29085628›Full record

ArticleBiomedical reports2017

Circulating cell-free DNA concentration and DNase I activity of peripheral blood plasma change in case of pregnancy with intrauterine growth restriction compared to normal pregnancy.

Elizaveta Ershova, Vasilina Sergeeva, Maria Klimenko, Kristina Avetisova, Peter Klimenko, Edmund Kostyuk, Natalia Veiko, Roman Veiko, Vera Izevskaya, Sergey Kutsev and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Exosomes-Associated DNA-New Marker in Pregnancy Complications?International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elizaveta ErshovaFederal State Budgetary Institution 'Research Centre For Medical Genetics', Moscow 115478, Russia.
Vasilina SergeevaFederal State Budgetary Institution 'Research Centre For Medical Genetics', Moscow 115478, Russia.
Maria KlimenkoPediatric Faculty, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow 117997, Russia.
Kristina AvetisovaPediatric Faculty, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow 117997, Russia.
Peter KlimenkoPediatric Faculty, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow 117997, Russia.
Edmund KostyukCenter of Family Planning and Reproduction, Moscow 117209, Russia.
Natalia VeikoFederal State Budgetary Institution 'Research Centre For Medical Genetics', Moscow 115478, Russia.
Roman VeikoFederal State Budgetary Institution 'Research Centre For Medical Genetics', Moscow 115478, Russia.
Vera IzevskayaFederal State Budgetary Institution 'Research Centre For Medical Genetics', Moscow 115478, Russia.
Sergey KutsevFederal State Budgetary Institution 'Research Centre For Medical Genetics', Moscow 115478, Russia.
Svetlana KostyukFederal State Budgetary Institution 'Research Centre For Medical Genetics', Moscow 115478, Russia.
Research Centre for Medical Genetics · RUPirogov Russian National Research Medical University · RUScientific Center of Family Health Problems and Human Reproduction · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The level of apoptosis is increased during pregnancy. Dying cells emit DNA that remains in blood circulation and is known as cell-free DNA (cfDNA). The concentration of cfDNA can reflect the level of cell death. The present article is the result of studying cfDNA concentration and DNase I activity in the blood plasma of 40 non-pregnant women (control), 40 healthy pregnant women (over 37 weeks) and 40 pregnant women with a diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). In order to explain the obtained results, a program modeling the change of cfDNA concentration under the influence of different internal and external factors was written. It was reported that, despite the fact that the level of cell death is increased, cfDNA concentration in blood can be decreased due to activation of cfDNA elimination system. A significant increase of DNase I activity has been reported in cases of IUGR. Increase in DNase I activity over a certain threshold indicates presence of pathological processes in the organism. CfDNA circulating in blood cannot be a reliable marker of increased cell death during pregnancy. Thus, assessment of the level of cell death during pregnancy should be done by simultaneous analysis of cfDNA level and DNase I activity.

Indexed as

cell-free DNAcirculating DNADNase Iextracellular DNAintrauterine growth restrictionpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID29085628
PMCPMC5649650
OpenAlexW2749440204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.