Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29085624›Full record

ArticleBiomedical reports2017

Human epididymis protein 4 may not be a reliable screening biomarker for detecting lung carcinoma patients.

Betul Celik, Tangul Bulut

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Betul CelikDepartment of Pathology, University of Health Sciences, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya 07050, Turkey.
Tangul BulutDepartment of Pathology, University of Health Sciences, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya 07050, Turkey.
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) acts as a protease inhibitor. It has been detected in the serum of patients with lung cancer patients and its utility for lung cancer screening was found in different studies. Nevertheless, little is known regarding the expression of HE4 in lung carcinoma subtypes. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether HE4 expression is a reliable marker for detecting any lung carcinoma subtypes, including small cell lung cancer (SCLC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and adenocarcinoma (AC). In total, 141 lung carcinoma patients were enrolled in the study. Biopsy samples were obtained from bronchoscopic biopsy. The tumors were classified as SCLC (group 1, 54 cases) or NSCLC (group 2, 87 cases) based on histology and immunohistochemistry. The latter was sub-grouped as adenocarcinoma (group 2a, AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (group 2b, SCC). The immunohistochemical expression of HE4 was compared between the groups. The study revealed that the majority of the SCLC and SCC cases were devoid of HE4 (90.1 and 89.65%, respectively). Approximately 10% of cases had HE4 immune expression and the staining was focal and moderate throughout the tumor tissue. On the other hand, 78.8% of AC expressed HE4 and the staining was diffuse and strong. The overall HE4 expression in the lung cancer patients was 33.7%. In conclusion, the results of the present study have shown that HE4 is expressed in adenocarcinoma of the lung but it is not frequent in SCC and SCLC. The value of HE4 as a screening biomarker for lung cancer is limited but its presence exclusively in adenocarcinoma may provide new insight for targeted therapy.

Indexed as

adenocarcinomahuman epididymis protein 4lungsmall cellsquamous cell

Identifiers

PMID29085624
PMCPMC5649646
OpenAlexW2747903049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.