Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29085599›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of basic medical sciences2017

Evaluation of

Najmeh Ghatei, Ariane Sadr Nabavi, Mohammad Hossein Bahreyni Toosi, Hosein Azimian, Mansour Homayoun, Reza Ghasemnezhad Targhi, Hossein Haghir

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of basic medical sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. 18Beta-Glycyrrhetinic Acid Attenuates HAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Design, synthesis, molecular docking, andSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Research in pharmaceutical sciences · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Najmeh GhateiDepartment of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Ariane Sadr NabaviDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Mohammad Hossein Bahreyni ToosiMedical Physics Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Hosein AzimianMedical Physics Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Mansour HomayounDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Reza Ghasemnezhad TarghiDepartment of Radiation Biology, School of Allied, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hossein HaghirDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe increasing rate of over using cell phones has been considerable in youths and pregnant women. We examined the effect of mobile phones radiation on genes expression variation on cerebellum of BALB/c mice before and after of the birth. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this study, a mobile phone jammer, which is an instrument to prevent receiving signals between cellular phones and base transceiver stations (two frequencies 900 and 1800 MHz) for exposure was used and twelve pregnant mice (BALB/c) divided into two groups (n=6), first group irradiated in pregnancy period (19th day), the second group did not irradiate in pregnancy period. After childbirth, offspring were classified into four groups (n=4): Group1: control, Group 2: B1 (Irradiated after birth), Group 3: B2 (Irradiated in pregnancy period and after birth), Group 4: B3 (Irradiated in pregnancy period). When maturity was completed (8-10 weeks old), mice were dissected and cerebellum was isolated. The expression level of

resultsThe data showed that mobile phone radio waves were ineffective on the expression level of bcl-2 and p53 genes)

conclusionFrom the obtained data it could be concluded that the mobile phone radiations did not induce apoptosis in cells of the cerebellum and the injured cells can be repaired by cell cycle arrest.

Indexed as

ApoptosisCerebellumGene expressionMiceMobile phone

Identifiers

PMID29085599
PMCPMC5651457
OpenAlexW2758539783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.