Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29085573›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2017

Assessing Species Diversity Using Metavirome Data: Methods and Challenges.

Damayanthi Herath, Duleepa Jayasundara, David Ackland, Isaam Saeed, Sen-Lin Tang, Saman Halgamuge

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Damayanthi HerathDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010 Melbourne, Australia.
Duleepa JayasundaraSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW 2052, Australia.
David AcklandDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010 Melbourne, Australia.
Isaam SaeedDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010 Melbourne, Australia.
Sen-Lin TangBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Nan-Kang, Taipei 11529, Taiwan.
Saman HalgamugeResearch School of Engineering, College of Engineering and Computer Science, The Australian National University, Canberra 2601, ACT, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing biodiversity is an important step in the study of microbial ecology associated with a given environment. Multiple indices have been used to quantify species diversity, which is a key biodiversity measure. Measuring species diversity of viruses in different environments remains a challenge relative to measuring the diversity of other microbial communities. Metagenomics has played an important role in elucidating viral diversity by conducting metavirome studies; however, metavirome data are of high complexity requiring robust data preprocessing and analysis methods. In this review, existing bioinformatics methods for measuring species diversity using metavirome data are categorised broadly as either sequence similarity-dependent methods or sequence similarity-independent methods. The former includes a comparison of DNA fragments or assemblies generated in the experiment against reference databases for quantifying species diversity, whereas estimates from the latter are independent of the knowledge of existing sequence data. Current methods and tools are discussed in detail, including their applications and limitations. Drawbacks of the state-of-the-art method are demonstrated through results from a simulation. In addition, alternative approaches are proposed to overcome the challenges in estimating species diversity measures using metavirome data.

Indexed as

BiodiversityBioinformaticsMetagenomicsMetavirome dataPhage studiesSpecies diversity

Identifiers

PMID29085573
PMCPMC5650650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.