Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29085456›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2017

The application of 3D printed surgical guides in resection and reconstruction of malignant bone tumor.

Fengping Wang, Jun Zhu, Xuejun Peng, Jing Su

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Augmented reality for intraoperative verification of surgical template placement.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Rehabilitation of Maxillectomy Patients Using Zygoma Implants.Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. [Application of three-dimensional printed customized prosthesis with preserved epiphysis and articular surface in the reconstruction of large bone defects in treatment of adolescent femoral malignant tumors].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Printing a patient-specific instrument guide for skull osteoma management.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fengping WangDepartment of Ultrasound, Linyi People's Hospital, Linyi, Shandong 276000, P.R. China.
Jun ZhuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Yidu Central Hospital of Weifang, Weifang, Shandong 262500, P.R. China.
Xuejun PengDepartment of Traumatology, Linyi People's Hospital, Linyi, Shandong 276000, P.R. China.
Jing SuCommunity Health Center of Yinque Mountain, Linyi, Shandong 276003, P.R. China.
Linyi People's Hospital · CNYidu Central Hospital of Weifang · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical value of 3D printed surgical guides in resection and reconstruction of malignant bone tumor around the knee joint were studied. For this purpose, a sample of 66 patients from October 2013 to October 2015 were randomly selected and further divided into control group and observation group, each group consisted of 33 cases. The control group was treated by conventional tumor resection whereas, in the observation group, the tumor was resected with 3D printed surgical guide. However, reconstruction of tumor-type hinge prosthesis was performed in both groups and then the clinical effect was compared. Results show that there was no significant difference in the operation time between the two groups (p>0.05). However, the blood loss, resection length and complication rate were found significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (p<0.05). The rate of negative margin and the recurrence rate in the 12-month follow-up (p>0.05) between two groups were statistically the same (p>0.05), whereas the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score of the knee joint in the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group (p<0.05) after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months of the operation. Consequently, the 3D printed surgical guides can significantly improve the postoperative joint function after resection and reconstruction of malignant bone tumor around the knee joint and can reduce the incidence of complications.

Indexed as

3D printingknee bone tumorprosthetic reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID29085456
PMCPMC5649697
OpenAlexW2742790672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.