Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29085377›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2017

Chickpea Genotypes Contrasting for Vigor and Canopy Conductance Also Differ in Their Dependence on Different Water Transport Pathways.

Kaliamoorthy Sivasakthi, Murugesan Tharanya, Jana Kholová, Ruth Wangari Muriuki, Thiyagarajan Thirunalasundari, Vincent Vadez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Safflower (PeerJ · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Pearl Millet Aquaporin GeneFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kaliamoorthy SivasakthiCrop Physiology Laboratory, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Pantancheru, India.
Murugesan TharanyaCrop Physiology Laboratory, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Pantancheru, India.
Jana KholováCrop Physiology Laboratory, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Pantancheru, India.
Ruth Wangari MuriukiDepartment of Agriculture, Egerton University, Egerton, Kenya.
Thiyagarajan ThirunalasundariDepartment of Industrial Biotechnology, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, India.
Vincent VadezCrop Physiology Laboratory, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Pantancheru, India.
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics · INBharathidasan University · INEgerton University · KE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lower plant transpiration rate (TR) under high vapor pressure deficit (VPD) conditions and early plant vigor are proposed as major traits influencing the rate of crop water use and possibly the fitness of chickpea lines to specific terminal drought conditions-this being the major constraint limiting chickpea productivity. The physiological mechanisms underlying difference in TR under high VPD and vigor are still unresolved, and so is the link between vigor and TR. Lower TR is hypothesized to relate to hydraulic conductance differences. Experiments were conducted in both soil (Vertisol) and hydroponic culture. The assessment of the TR response to increasing VPD showed that high vigor genotypes had TR restriction under high VPD, and this was confirmed in the early vigor parent and progeny genotype (ICC 4958 and RIL 211) having lower TR than the late vigor parent and progeny genotype (ICC 1882 and RIL 022). Inhibition of water transport pathways [apoplast and symplast (aquaporins)] in intact plants led to a lower transpiration inhibition in the early vigor/low TR genotypes than in the late vigor/high TR genotypes. De-rooted shoot treatment with an aquaporin inhibitor led to a lower transpiration inhibition in the early vigor/low TR genotypes than in the late vigor/high TR genotypes. Early vigor genotypes had lower root hydraulic conductivity than late vigor/high TR genotypes. Under inhibited conditions (apoplast, symplast), root hydraulic conductivity was reduced more in the late vigor/high TR genotypes than in the early vigor/low TR genotypes. We interpret that early vigor/low TR genotypes have a lower involvement of aquaporins in water transport pathways and may also have a smaller apoplastic pathway than high TR genotypes, which could explain the transpiration restriction under high VPD and would be helpful to conserve soil water under high evaporative demand. These findings open an opportunity for breeding to tailor genotypes with different "dosage" of these traits toward adaptation to varying drought-prone environments.

Indexed as

apoplastic pathwayaquaporinshigh vapor pressure deficit (VPD)hydraulic conductancetranspiration rate (TR)vigorwater deficits

Identifiers

PMID29085377
PMCPMC5649140
OpenAlexW2756729348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.