Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29085256›Full record

ArticleIEEE sensors journal2017

Automatic Detection of Seismocardiogram Sensor Misplacement for Robust Pre-Ejection Period Estimation in Unsupervised Settings.

Hazar Ashouri, Omer T Inan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE sensors journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Synthetic seismocardiogram generation using a transformer-based neural network.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Modeling Consistent Dynamics of Cardiogenic Vibrations in Low-Dimensional Subspace.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Wearable ballistocardiogram and seismocardiogram systems for health and performance.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2018
    Review
  15. SeismoWatch: Wearable Cuffless Blood Pressure Monitoring Using Pulse Transit Time.Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hazar AshouriSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA.
Omer T InanSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA.

Funding

Unobtrusive and Affordable Blood Pressure Monitoring Via Pulse Transit TimeU01EB018818 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MUKKAMALA, RAMAKRISHNA · 2014 to 2018
$3.4M
Non-invasive biosensors to detect cardiovascular changes in heart failureR01HL130619 · NHLBI · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI INAN, OMER TOLGA, KLEIN, LIVIU · 2016 to 2020
$2.9M
Wearable Cardiomechanics Monitor to Decrease Heart Failure ReadmissionsR56AG048458 · NIA · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI INAN, OMER TOLGA, KLEIN, LIVIU · 2015 to 2015
$616k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL130619NIA NIH HHS R56 AG048458NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB018818
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seismocardiography (SCG), the measurement of the local chest vibrations due to the movements of blood and the heart, is a non-invasive technique for assessing myocardial contractility via the pre-ejection period (PEP). Recently, SCG-based extraction of PEP has been shown to be an effective means of classifying decompensated from compensated heart failure patients, and thus can be potentially used for monitoring such patients at home. Accurate extraction of PEP from SCG signals hinges on lab-based population data (i.e., regression curves) linking particular time-domain features of the SCG signal to corresponding features from reference standard bulky instruments such as impedance cardiography (ICG). Such regression curves, in the case of SCG, have always been estimated based on the "ideal" positioning of the SCG sensor on the chest. However, in settings such as the home where users may position the SCG measurement hardware on the chest without supervision, it is likely that the sensor will not always be placed exactly on this "ideal" location on the sternum, but rather on other positions on the chest as well. In this study, we show for the first time that the regression curve for estimating PEP from SCG signals differs significantly as the position of the sensor changes. We further devise a method to automatically detect when the sensor is placed in any position other than the desired one in order to avoid inaccurate systolic time interval estimation. Our classification algorithm for this purpose resulted in 0.83 precision and 0.82 recall when classifying whether the sensor is placed in the desired position or not. The classifier was tested with heartbeats taken both at rest, and also during exercise recovery to ensure that waveform changes due to positioning could be accurately discriminated from those due to physiological effects.

Indexed as

accelerometerheart failurepre-ejection periodSeismocardiogramunobtrusive cardiac monitoring

Identifiers

PMID29085256
PMCPMC5659316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.