ArticleIEEE sensors journal2017
Automatic Detection of Seismocardiogram Sensor Misplacement for Robust Pre-Ejection Period Estimation in Unsupervised Settings.
Article in IEEE sensors journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accurate Detection of Dobutamine-induced Haemodynamic Changes by Kino-Cardiography: A Randomised Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Validation Study.Scientific reports · 2019Trial
- Heart rate informed detection of cardiac events using the Kalman filter.Computers in biology and medicine · 2025Article
- Synthetic seismocardiogram generation using a transformer-based neural network.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Article
- An Overview of the Sensors for Heart Rate Monitoring Used in Extramural Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Detection of Aortic Valve Opening and Estimation of Pre-Ejection Period in Forcecardiography Recordings.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A Novel Broadband Forcecardiography Sensor for Simultaneous Monitoring of Respiration, Infrasonic Cardiac Vibrations and Heart Sounds.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- Forcecardiography: A Novel Technique to Measure Heart Mechanical Vibrations onto the Chest Wall.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Modeling Consistent Dynamics of Cardiogenic Vibrations in Low-Dimensional Subspace.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2020Article
- A Unified Framework for Quality Indexing and Classification of Seismocardiogram Signals.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2020Article
- Detection and Analysis of Heartbeats in Seismocardiogram Signals.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Real-Time Cardiac Beat Detection and Heart Rate Monitoring from Combined Seismocardiography and Gyrocardiography.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Recent Advances in Seismocardiography.Vibration · 2019Article
- Universal Pre-Ejection Period Estimation Using Seismocardiography: Quantifying the Effects of Sensor Placement and Regression Algorithms.IEEE sensors journal · 2018Article
- Wearable ballistocardiogram and seismocardiogram systems for health and performance.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2018Review
- SeismoWatch: Wearable Cuffless Blood Pressure Monitoring Using Pulse Transit Time.Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Seismocardiography (SCG), the measurement of the local chest vibrations due to the movements of blood and the heart, is a non-invasive technique for assessing myocardial contractility via the pre-ejection period (PEP). Recently, SCG-based extraction of PEP has been shown to be an effective means of classifying decompensated from compensated heart failure patients, and thus can be potentially used for monitoring such patients at home. Accurate extraction of PEP from SCG signals hinges on lab-based population data (i.e., regression curves) linking particular time-domain features of the SCG signal to corresponding features from reference standard bulky instruments such as impedance cardiography (ICG). Such regression curves, in the case of SCG, have always been estimated based on the "ideal" positioning of the SCG sensor on the chest. However, in settings such as the home where users may position the SCG measurement hardware on the chest without supervision, it is likely that the sensor will not always be placed exactly on this "ideal" location on the sternum, but rather on other positions on the chest as well. In this study, we show for the first time that the regression curve for estimating PEP from SCG signals differs significantly as the position of the sensor changes. We further devise a method to automatically detect when the sensor is placed in any position other than the desired one in order to avoid inaccurate systolic time interval estimation. Our classification algorithm for this purpose resulted in 0.83 precision and 0.82 recall when classifying whether the sensor is placed in the desired position or not. The classifier was tested with heartbeats taken both at rest, and also during exercise recovery to ensure that waveform changes due to positioning could be accurately discriminated from those due to physiological effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.