Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29085231›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2017

Prognostic factors of response to endoscopic treatment in painful chronic pancreatitis.

Alina Tantau, Alina Mandrutiu, Daniel-Corneliu Leucuta, Lidia Ciobanu, Marcel Tantau

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. An ethical analysis of endoscopic therapy decision-making in patients with refractory substance use disorder and chronic pancreatitis.Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] · 2022
    Review
  4. Turkish Gastroenterology Association, Pancreas Study Group, Chronic Pancreatitis Committee Consensus Report.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2020
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alina TantauDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca City, 400012 Cluj, Romania.
Alina MandrutiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Medical Center, Cluj-Napoca City, 400132 Cluj, Romania. office@doctortantau.ro.
Daniel-Corneliu LeucutaMedical Informatics and Biostatistics Department, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca City, 400012 Cluj, Romania.
Lidia CiobanuDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca City, 400012 Cluj, Romania.
Marcel TantauDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca City, 400012 Cluj, Romania.
Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the endoscopic treatment efficacy and prognostic factors of long-term response to treatment for painful chronic pancreatitis.

methodsThis retrospective analysis identified 168 patients with painful chronic pancreatitis hospitalized during January 2010-January 2015 in a Romanian tertiary referral center. Data on demographics, medical history, alcohol consumption, smoking habit, clinical parameters, type and number of endoscopic procedures and hospital admissions number were collected from the medical charts and analyzed. The absence or substantial reduction of pain (mild pain) at the end of the follow-up associated with the technical success of endotherapy was considered as clinical success.

resultsAmong the 168 patients with painful chronic pancreatitis admitted to our department during the study period, 39 (23.21%) had optimal response to the medical therapy. One hundred and twenty-nine patients required endoscopic treatment. The median follow-up period was 15 mo (range, 0-60 mo). Overall, technical success of endotherapy was achieved in 105 patients (81.39%). More than two-thirds of patients (82.78%) had substantial improvement of pain after the endoscopic treatment, including frequency and severity of the pain attacks. Patients younger than 40 years had significantly more successful endoscopic procedures (

conclusionYounger age than 40 years can be considered an important factor positively influencing endoscopic treatment outcome in patients with painful chronic pancreatitis.

Indexed as

Endoscopy, Digestive SystemAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAlcohol DrinkingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPainPain ManagementPain MeasurementAlcoholChronic pancreatitisClinical successEndoscopic proceduresHospital admissionPainSmokingTechnical success

Identifiers

PMID29085231
PMCPMC5645621
OpenAlexW2758122861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.