Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29085003›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

A random acceleration model of individual animal movement allowing for diffusive, superdiffusive and superballistic regimes.

Paulo F C Tilles, Sergei V Petrovskii, Paulo L Natti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paulo F C TillesDepartamento de Matematica, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Sergei V PetrovskiiDepartment of Mathematics, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK. sp237@le.ac.uk.
Paulo L NattiDepartamento de Matematica, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5988-2621

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patterns of individual animal movement attracted considerable attention over the last two decades. In particular, question as to whether animal movement is predominantly diffusive or superdiffusive has been a focus of discussion and controversy. We consider this problem using a theory of stochastic motion based on the Langevin equation with non-Wiener stochastic forcing that originates in animal's response to environmental noise. We show that diffusive and superdiffusive types of motion are inherent parts of the same general movement process that arises as interplay between the force exerted by animals (essentially, by animal's muscles) and the environmental drag. The movement is superballistic with the mean square displacement growing with time as [Formula: see text] at the beginning and eventually slowing down to the diffusive spread [Formula: see text]. We show that the duration of the superballistic and superdiffusive stages can be long depending on the properties of the environmental noise and the intensity of drag. Our findings demonstrate theoretically how the movement pattern that includes diffusive and superdiffusive/superballistic motion arises naturally as a result of the interplay between the dissipative properties of the environment and the animal's biological traits such as the body mass, typical movement velocity and the typical duration of uninterrupted movement.

Indexed as

AccelerationAnimal DistributionAnimalsDiffusionModels, BiologicalModels, StatisticalModels, TheoreticalMotionMovementStochastic Processes

Identifiers

PMID29085003
PMCPMC5662607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.