Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29084796›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2017

NAITRE study on the impact of conditional cash transfer on poor pregnancy outcomes in underprivileged women: protocol for a nationwide pragmatic cluster-randomised superiority clinical trial in France.

Marc Bardou, Bruno Crépon, Anne-Claire Bertaux, Aurélie Godard-Marceaux, Astrid Eckman-Lacroix, Elise Thellier, Frédérique Falchier, Philippe Deruelle, Muriel Doret, Xavier Carcopino-Tusoli and 12 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02402855 (Impact of Conditional Financial Support on Pregnancy Outcomes in Pregnant Women With Low Incomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02402855 nacompletednot on this map

Impact of Conditional Financial Support on Pregnancy Outcomes in Pregnant Women With Low Incomes: Pragmatic Randomized Cluster Trial, With Parallel Arms

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonRan2016 to 2020Enrolled3,787ConditionsPregnancyArmsDelivery of a prepaid payment card, Interview with a sociologist, No intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Bolsa Familia Program and Perinatal Outcomes: NISAMI Cohort.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 17 institutions in 2 countries.

Marc BardouCentre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM 1432, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon, Dijon, Bourgogne, France.
Bruno CréponCentre de Recherche en Economie Statistique (CREST), Malakoff, France.
Anne-Claire BertauxUnité de Soutien Méthodologique à la Recherche, CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Dijon, Bourgogne, France.
Aurélie Godard-MarceauxNeurosciences Intégratives et cliniques EA 481, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Besançon, France.
Astrid Eckman-LacroixService de Gynécologie Obstétrique, CHU de Besancon, Paris, France.
Elise ThellierService de Gynécologie Obstétrique, CHU de Bicetre, Paris, France.
Frédérique FalchierService de Gynécologie Obstétrique, CHU de Brest, Brest, France.
Philippe DeruelleService de Gynécologie Obstétrique, CHRU De Lille, Lille, France.
Muriel DoretService de Gynécologie Obstétrique, Hospices Civils de Lyon-Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Lyon, Rhône-Alpes, France.
Xavier Carcopino-TusoliService de Gynécologie Obstétrique, CHU de Marseille Hôpital Nord, Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azu, France.
Thomas SchmitzService de Gynécologie Obstétrique, CHU Robert Debré, Paris, Île-de-France, France.
Thiphaine BarjatService de Gynécologie Obstétrique, CHU de Saint Etienne, Saint Etienne, France.
Mathieu MorinService de Gynécologie Obstétrique, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, Midi-Pyrénées, France.
Franck PerrotinService de Gynécologie Obstétrique, CHU Bretonneau, Tours, France.
Ghada HatemService de Gynécologie Obstétrique, Centre Hospitalier de Saint Denis, Saint Denis, Île-de-France, France.
Catherine Deneux-TharauxINSERM UMR 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Center for Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, DHU Risks in Pregnancy, Paris Descartes University, Paris France, Paris, France.
Isabelle FournelCentre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM 1432, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon, Dijon, Bourgogne, France.
Laurent LaforetCentre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM 1432, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon, Dijon, Bourgogne, France.
Nicolas Meunier-BeillardNeurosciences Intégratives et cliniques EA 481, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Besançon, France.
Esther DufloDepartment of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Isabelle Le RayService de Gynécologie Obstétrique, CHRU Strasbourg, Strasbourg, Alsace, France.
NAITRE Study Group
Inserm · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCentre de Recherche en Économie et Statistique · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest · FRCentre Hospitalier Saint-Denis · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours · FRCHU Dijon Bourgogne · FRHôpital Femme Mère Enfant · FRHôpital Nord · FRHôpital Robert-Debré · FRHôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg · FRMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USUniversité Bourgogne Franche-Comté · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrenatal care is recommended during pregnancy to improve neonatal and maternal outcomes. Women of lower socioeconomic status (SES) are less compliant to recommended prenatal care and suffer a higher risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Several attempts to encourage optimal pregnancy follow-up have shown controversial results, particularly in high-income countries. Few studies have assessed financial incentives to encourage prenatal care, and none reported materno-fetal events as the primary outcome. Our study aims to determine whether financial incentives could improve pregnancy outcomes in women with low SES in a high-income country. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This pragmatic cluster-randomised clinical trial includes pregnant women with the following criteria: (1) age above 18 years, (2) first pregnancy visit before 26 weeks of gestation and (3) belonging to a socioeconomically disadvantaged group. The intervention consists in offering financial incentives conditional on attending scheduled pregnancy follow-up consultations. Clusters are 2-month periods with random turnover across centres. A composite outcome of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality is the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints include maternal or neonatal outcomes assessed separately, qualitative assessment of the perception of the intervention and cost-effectiveness analysis for which children will be followed to the end of their first year through the French health insurance database. The study started in June 2016, and based on an expected decrease in the primary endpoint from 18% to 14% in the intervention group, we plan to include 2000 women in each group. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was first gained on 28 September 2014. An independent data security and monitoring committee has been established. Results of the main trial and each of the secondary analyses will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02402855; pre-results.

Indexed as

MotivationPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancy OutcomeSocial ClassAdultFemaleFetusFranceGestational AgeHumansInfant HealthInfant, NewbornMaternal HealthPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal Careclinical governancematernal medicineorganisation of health services

Identifiers

PMID29084796
PMCPMC5665235
OpenAlexW2766631861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.