Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29084555›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health geographics2017

Urban-rural inequalities in suicide mortality: a comparison of urbanicity indicators.

M Helbich, V Blüml, T de Jong, P L Plener, M-P Kwan, N D Kapusta

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health geographics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Epidemiology of Suicide Mortality in Paraguay from 2005 to 2019: A Descriptive Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Predicting Suicide in Counties: Creating a Quantitative Measure of Suicide Risk.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Inequalities of Suicide Mortality across Urban and Rural Areas: A Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M HelbichDepartment of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands. m.helbich@uu.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-0392-8915
V BlümlDepartment of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
T de JongDepartment of Logistics, University of Stellenbosch, Van der Sterrbuilding 3017, Bosmanstreet, Matieland, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
P L PlenerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Ulm, 89075, Ulm, Germany.
M-P KwanDepartment of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
N D KapustaDepartment of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrban-rural disparities in suicide mortality have received considerable attention. Varying conceptualizations of urbanity may contribute to the conflicting findings. This ecological study on Germany assessed how and to what extent urban-rural suicide associations are affected by 14 different urban-rural indicators.

methodsIndicators were based on continuous or k-means classified population data, land-use data, planning typologies, or represented population-based accessibility indicators. Agreements between indicators were tested with correlation analyses. Spatial Bayesian Poisson regressions were estimated to examine urban-rural suicide associations while adjusting for risk and protective factors.

resultsUrban-rural differences in suicide rates per 100,000 persons were found irrespective of the indicator. Strong and significant correlation was observed between different urban-rural indicators. Although the effect sign consistently referred to a reduced risk in urban areas, statistical significance was not universally confirmed by all regressions. Goodness-of-fit statistics suggested that the population potential score performs best, and that population density is the second best indicator of urbanicity. Numerical indicators are favored over classified ones. Regional planning typologies are not supported.

conclusionsThe strength of suicide urban-rural associations varies with respect to the applied indicator of urbanicity. Future studies that put urban-rural inequalities central are recommended to apply either unclassified population potentials or population density indicators, but sensitivity analyses are advised.

Indexed as

Socioeconomic FactorsBayes TheoremCross-Sectional StudiesGermanyHumansMortalityRural PopulationSuicideSuicide PreventionUrban PopulationGermanyIndicator comparisonSpatial inequalitiesSuicide mortalityUrban–rural differences

Identifiers

PMID29084555
PMCPMC5663034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.