Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29084424›Full record

ReviewAnalytical chemistry2018

Chemical Analysis of DNA Damage.

Yang Yu, Pengcheng Wang, Yuxiang Cui, Yinsheng Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Analytical chemistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Mapping assays to the key characteristics of carcinogens to support decision-making.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. LC-MS/MS for Assessing the Incorporation and Repair ofChemical research in toxicology · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yang YuEnvironmental Toxicology Graduate Program and ‡Department of Chemistry, University of California , Riverside, California 92521-0403, United States.
Pengcheng WangEnvironmental Toxicology Graduate Program and ‡Department of Chemistry, University of California , Riverside, California 92521-0403, United States.
Yuxiang CuiEnvironmental Toxicology Graduate Program and ‡Department of Chemistry, University of California , Riverside, California 92521-0403, United States.
Yinsheng WangEnvironmental Toxicology Graduate Program and ‡Department of Chemistry, University of California , Riverside, California 92521-0403, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5565-283X

Funding

PROTEOMICSP01AG043376 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ROBBINS, PAUL D. · 2013 to 2019
$11.2M
Quantitative Adductomics Approaches for Assessing the Occurrence and Repair of DNA AdductsR01CA210072 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI WANG, YINSHENG · 2017 to 2021
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA210072NIA NIH HHS P01 AG043376
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

DNA DamageAlkylating AgentsAminesAnimalsChemistry Techniques, AnalyticalDNADNA AdductsHeterocyclic CompoundsHumansReactive Oxygen SpeciesAlkylating AgentsAminesDNADNA AdductsHeterocyclic CompoundsReactive Oxygen Species

Identifiers

PMID29084424
PMCPMC6029243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.