Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29084275›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Changing the South African national antiretroviral therapy guidelines: The role of cost modelling.

Gesine Meyer-Rath, Leigh F Johnson, Yogan Pillay, Mark Blecher, Alana T Brennan, Lawrence Long, Harry Moultrie, Ian Sanne, Matthew P Fox, Sydney Rosen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Adult intussusception in the era of HIV/AIDS: A case report.Southern African journal of infectious diseases · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gesine Meyer-RathDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0439-381X
Leigh F JohnsonCentre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Yogan PillayNational Department of Health, Pretoria, South Africa.
Mark BlecherNational Treasury, Pretoria, South Africa.
Alana T BrennanDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Lawrence LongHealth Economics and Epidemiology Research Office (HE2RO), Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Harry MoultrieWits RHI, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Ian SanneHealth Economics and Epidemiology Research Office (HE2RO), Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Matthew P FoxDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Sydney RosenDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America.

Funding

Rates, Predictors and Mortality Impact of Losses from HIV Care in South AfricaK01AI083097 · NIAID · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI FOX, MATTHEW ALEXANDER PEASE · 2009 to 2013
$615k
NIAID NIH HHS K01 AI083097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe were tasked by the South African Department of Health to assess the cost implications to the largest ART programme in the world of adopting sets of ART guidelines issued by the World Health Organization between 2010 and 2016.

methodsUsing data from large South African ART clinics (n = 24,244 patients), projections of patients in need of ART, and cost data from bottom-up cost analyses, we constructed a population-level health-state transition model with 6-monthly transitions between health states depending on patients' age, CD4 cell count/ percentage, and, for adult first-line ART, time on treatment.

findingsFor each set of guidelines, the modelled increase in patient numbers as a result of prevalence and uptake was substantially more than the increase resulting from additional eligibility. Under each set of guidelines, the number of people on ART was projected to increase by 31-133% over the next seven years, and cost by 84-175%, while increased eligibility led to 1-26% more patients, and 1-17% higher cost. The projected increases in treatment cost due to the 2010 and the 2015 WHO guidelines could be offset in their entirety by the introduction of cost-saving measures such as opening the drug tenders for international competition and task-shifting. Under universal treatment, annual costs of the treatment programme will decrease for the first time from 2024 onwards.

conclusionsAnnual budgetary requirements for ART will continue to increase in South Africa until universal treatment is taken to full scale. Model results were instrumental in changing South African ART guidelines, more than tripling the population on treatment between 2009 and 2017, and reducing the per-patient cost of treatment by 64%.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-HIV AgentsFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMalePractice Guidelines as TopicSouth AfricaYoung AdultAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID29084275
PMCPMC5662079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.