Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29084160›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2017

New Instrument to Measure Hospital Patient Experiences in Flanders.

Luk Bruyneel, Else Tambuyzer, Ellen Coeckelberghs, Dirk De Wachter, Walter Sermeus, Dirk De Ridder, Dirk Ramaekers, Ilse Weeghmans, Kris Vanhaecht

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Validation and Adjustment of the Patient Experience Questionnaire (PEQ): A Regional Hospital Study in Norway.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Luk BruyneelKU Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. luk.bruyneel@med.kuleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0003-1209-692X
Else TambuyzerFlemish Patient Platform, Groenveldstraat 15, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium. else.tambuyzer@vlaamspatientenplatform.be.
Ellen CoeckelberghsKU Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. ellen.coeckelberghs@kuleuven.be.
Dirk De WachterSpecialised Care Division, Flemish Agency for Care and Health, Flemish public administration, Koning Albert II Laan 35, 1030 Brussels, Belgium. dirk.dewachter@zorg-en-gezondheid.be.
Walter SermeusKU Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. walter.sermeus@kuleuven.be.
Dirk De RidderKU Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. dirk.deridder@uzleuven.be.
Dirk RamaekersKU Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. dirk.ramaekers@kuleuven.be.
Ilse WeeghmansFlemish Patient Platform, Groenveldstraat 15, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium. ilse.weeghmans@vlaamspatientenplatform.be.
Kris VanhaechtKU Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. kris.vanhaecht@kuleuven.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implementing a standardized patient experience survey may initiate a process to apply pressure on hospitals to attend to improving patient experiences. In Flanders, Belgium, the Flemish Patient Survey was developed between 2011 and 2015. A preliminary version was developed from a scoping review and patient and expert focus groups, and included 27 items for eight hypothesized dimensions: 'preparing for hospital stay', 'information and communication', 'coordination', 'respect', 'privacy', 'safe care', pain management', and 'participation'. Exploratory factor analysis for 1076 patients in 17 hospitals found that the data did not fit the dimensions. Adaptations in item wording and response categories were based on the US Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems. The revised version showed excellent model fit in 22,143 patients in 37 hospitals. Multiple group analysis pointed to evidence of measurement invariance over time across mode of administration, type of nursing unit, and various patient characteristics. Fostering a collaborative approach thus proved successful in implementing a standardized patient experience survey. The most recent findings (2016) illustrate substandard performance and a need for patient-mix adjustment. The Flemish government developed a dedicated website to make findings publicly available and the federal government currently considers patient experiences in devising a pay-for-quality scheme.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesBelgiumCommunicationFemaleFocus GroupsHospitalsHumansInpatientsLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPain ManagementPatient SatisfactionPrivacyHCAHPShospitalspatient satisfactionpay-for-qualitypublic reporting

Identifiers

PMID29084160
PMCPMC5707958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.