Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29084044›Full record

ReviewJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)2018

Evolving Models and Ongoing Challenges for HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Implementation in the United States.

Kenneth H Mayer, Philip A Chan, Rupa R Patel, Charlene A Flash, Douglas S Krakower

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kenneth H MayerThe Fenway Institute, Fenway Health, Boston, MA.
Philip A ChanDepartment of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI.
Rupa R PatelDepartment of Internal Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
Charlene A FlashSection of Infectious Diseases, Division of Internal Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
Douglas S KrakowerThe Fenway Institute, Fenway Health, Boston, MA.

Funding

The impact of HIV viral diversity and cellular immunity on HIV pathogenesisP30AI060354 · NIAID · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI RAJESH T GANDHI · 2004 to 2026
$94.4M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences (KL2) KL2TR002346 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Dominic N Reeds · 2017 to 2026
$14.0M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesKL2TR000450 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$8.8M
Optimizing PrEP uptake & Adherence among MSWs using a 2-stage randomization designR34MH110369 · NIMH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI BIELLO, KATIE BROOKS, CHAN, PHILIP ANDREW · 2016 to 2018
$879k
Optimizing HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis through Shared Decision MakingK23MH098795 · NIMH · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI KRAKOWER, DOUGLAS SCOTT · 2012 to 2016
$873k
PrEP uptake, adherence & retention for African American MSM in MississippiR34MH109371 · NIMH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI CHAN, PHILIP ANDREW, MENA, LEANDRO ANTONIO · 2016 to 2018
$736k
A brief motivational interviewing-based intervention to improve HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake among men who have sex with menR34DA042648 · NIDA · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI CHAN, PHILIP ANDREW, MOITRA, ETHAN · 2017 to 2019
$692k
A novel use of web-based software to efficiently triage pre-surgical patients basR44TR000045 · NCATS · MEDSLEUTH, INC. · PI KALAMAS, ALICIA GRUBER · 2012 to 2012
$546k
Developing an Implementation Program to Optimize Uptake of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis among Black Women in Primary Care SettingsK23MH109358 · NIMH · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI FLASH, CHARLENE A · 2015 to 2017
$527k
Enhancing Population Impact of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis ImplementationR21MH109360 · NIMH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI CHAN, PHILIP ANDREW, MARSHALL, BRANDON DAVID LEWIS · 2016 to 2017
$459k
Evaluating HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis implementation using an all payers claims databaseR21MH113431 · NIMH · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI CHAN, PHILIP ANDREW, GALARRAGA, OMAR · 2017 to 2018
$426k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000450NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002346NCATS NIH HHS R44 TR000045NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI060354NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA042648NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH098795NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH109358NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH109360NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH113431NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH109371NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH110369
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2012, but delivery to at-risk persons has lagged. This critical review analyzes the current state of PrEP implementation in the United States, by reviewing barriers and innovative solutions to enhance PrEP access and uptake.

settingClinical care settings, public health programs, and community-based organizations (CBOs).

methodsCritical review of recent peer-reviewed literature.

resultsMore than 100 papers were reviewed. PrEP is currently provided in diverse settings. Care models include sexually transmitted disease clinics, community health centers, CBOs, pharmacies, and private primary care providers (PCPs). Sexually transmitted disease clinics have staff trained in sexual health counseling and are linked to public health programs (eg, partner notification services), whereas PCPs and community health centers may be less comfortable counseling and feel time-constrained in managing PrEP. However, PCPs may be ideal PrEP providers, given their long-term relationships with patients, integrating PrEP into routine care. Collaborations with CBOs can expand PrEP care through adherence support and insurance navigation. Pharmacies can deliver PrEP, given their experience with medication dispensing and counseling, and may be more accessible for some patients, but to address other health concerns, liaisons with PCPs may be needed.

conclusionsPrEP implementation in the United States is moving forward with the development of diverse models of delivery. Optimal scale-up will require learning about the best features of each model and providing choices to consumers that enhance engagement and uptake.

Indexed as

Health Services AdministrationHealth Services ResearchChemopreventionDisease Transmission, InfectiousHIV InfectionsHumansPre-Exposure ProphylaxisUnited States

Identifiers

PMID29084044
PMCPMC5762416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.