Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29083322›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical investigation2017

Cardiomyocyte proliferation prevents failure in pressure overload but not volume overload.

Karl Toischer, Wuqiang Zhu, Mark Hünlich, Belal A Mohamed, Sara Khadjeh, Sean P Reuter, Katrin Schäfer, Deepak Ramanujam, Stefan Engelhardt, Loren J Field and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. STEMIN and YAP5SA, the future of heart repair?Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Regulation of endogenous cardiomyocyte proliferation: The known unknowns.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. I-Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Karl ToischerDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology, Heart Center, Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany.
Wuqiang ZhuKrannert Institute of Cardiology and Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Mark HünlichDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology, Heart Center, Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany.
Belal A MohamedDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology, Heart Center, Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany.
Sara KhadjehDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology, Heart Center, Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany.
Sean P ReuterKrannert Institute of Cardiology and Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Katrin SchäferDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology, Heart Center, Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany.
Deepak RamanujamInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Stefan EngelhardtInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Loren J FieldKrannert Institute of Cardiology and Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Gerd HasenfussDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology, Heart Center, Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany.
University of Göttingen · DEGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEMansoura University · EG

Funding

Cardiomyocyte cell cycle activity in injured heartsR01HL132927 · NHLBI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI FIELD, LOREN J · 2017 to 2020
$1.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL132927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Induction of the cell cycle is emerging as an intervention to treat heart failure. Here, we tested the hypothesis that enhanced cardiomyocyte renewal in transgenic mice expressing cyclin D2 would be beneficial during hemodynamic overload. We induced pressure overload by transthoracic aortic constriction (TAC) or volume overload by aortocaval shunt in cyclin D2-expressing and WT mice. Although cyclin D2 expression dramatically improved survival following TAC, it did not confer a survival advantage to mice following aortocaval shunt. Cardiac function decreased following TAC in WT mice, but was preserved in cyclin D2-expressing mice. On the other hand, cardiac structure and function were compromised in response to aortocaval shunt in both WT and cyclin D2-expressing mice. The preserved function and improved survival in cyclin D2-expressing mice after TAC was associated with an approximately 50% increase in cardiomyocyte number and exaggerated cardiac hypertrophy, as indicated by increased septum thickness. Aortocaval shunt did not further impact cardiomyocyte number in mice expressing cyclin D2. Following TAC, cyclin D2 expression attenuated cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, reduced cardiomyocyte apoptosis, fibrosis, calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IIδ phosphorylation, brain natriuretic peptide expression, and sustained capillarization. Thus, we show that cyclin D2-induced cardiomyocyte renewal reduced myocardial remodeling and dysfunction after pressure overload but not after volume overload.

Indexed as

Cell ProliferationAnimalsAortic DiseasesCardiomegalyConstriction, PathologicCyclin D2Heart FailureMiceMice, TransgenicMyocytes, CardiacCcnd2 protein, mouseCyclin D2CardiologyCell BiologyCell cycleHeart failure

Identifiers

PMID29083322
PMCPMC5707145
OpenAlexW2765352982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.