Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29083096›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2018

Compressed sensing in quantitative determination of GAG concentration in cartilage by microscopic MRI.

Nian Wang, Farid Badar, Yang Xia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Rapid compositional mapping of knee cartilage with compressed sensing MRI.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nian WangCenter for In Vivo Microscopy, Department of Radiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Farid BadarDepartment of Physics and Center for Biomedical Research, Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan, USA.
Yang XiaDepartment of Physics and Center for Biomedical Research, Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan, USA.
Oakland University · USDuke University · US

Funding

INTEGRATED CENTER FOR IN VIVO MICROSCOPYP41EB015897 · NIBIB · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, GEORGE ALLAN · 2012 to 2017
$7.4M
ACL Deficiency Modifies Topographical Degradation in Posttraumatic OsteoarthritisR01AR069047 · NIAMS · OAKLAND UNIVERSITY · PI XIA, YANG · 2016 to 2022
$2.2M
Adaptability of Articular Cartilage to External Loading by Microscopic ImagingR01AR052353 · NIAMS · OAKLAND UNIVERSITY · PI XIA, YANG · 2008 to 2013
$2.1M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR052353NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR069047NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the potentials of compressed sensing (CS) in MRI quantification of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) concentration in articular cartilage at microscopic resolution.

methodsT

resultsUsing 2D variable density sampling pattern, the T

conclusionThis study demonstrates that CS could be beneficial in microscopic MRI (µMRI) studies of cartilage by acquiring less data, without losing significant accuracy in the quantification of GAG concentration. Magn Reson Med 79:3163-3171, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnisotropyCartilage, ArticularDogsGlycosaminoglycansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMicroscopyGlycosaminoglycansanisotropycartilagecompressed sensingGAGMRIT1

Identifiers

PMID29083096
PMCPMC5843514
OpenAlexW2765289989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.