Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29083029›Full record

ArticleJournal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines2018

Dimensional assessment of schizotypal, psychotic, and other psychiatric traits in children and their parents: development and validation of the Childhood Oxford-Liverpool Inventory of Feelings and Experiences on a representative US sample.

David W Evans, Laina G Lusk, Mylissa M Slane, Andrew M Michael, Scott M Myers, Mirko Uljarević, Oliver Mason, Gordon Claridge, Thomas Frazier

Open access · bronzeAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

David W EvansDepartment of Psychology, Program in Neuroscience, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA, USA.
Laina G LuskDepartment of Psychology, Program in Neuroscience, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA, USA.
Mylissa M SlaneGeisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.
Andrew M MichaelGeisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.
Scott M MyersGeisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.
Mirko UljarevićOlga Tennison Autism Research Centre, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
Oliver MasonSchool of Psychology, University of Surrey Stag Hill, Guilford, Surrey, UK.
Gordon ClaridgeDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Thomas FrazierCleveland Clinic Children's Hospital, Center for Pediatric Behavioral Health, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Geisinger Health System · USBucknell University · USCleveland Clinic · USLa Trobe University · AUUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Surrey · GB

Funding

GENE DOSAGE IMBALANCE IN NEURODEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERSR01MH074090 · NIMH · GEISINGER CLINIC · PI David H. Ledbetter, CHRISTA LESE MARTIN · 2005 to 2026
$13.5M
Gender differences in quantitative measures of autonomic function and clinical features of the autism phenotypeR01MH107431 · NIMH · GEISINGER CLINIC · PI MARTIN, CHRISTA LESE · 2015 to 2019
$3.4M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH074090NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthy functioning relies on a variety of perceptual, cognitive, emotional, and behavioral abilities that are distributed throughout the normal population. Variation in these traits define the wide range of neurodevelopmental (NDD) and neuropsychiatric (NPD) disorders. Here, we introduce a new measure for assessing these traits in typically developing children and children at risk for NDD and NPD from age 2 to 18 years.

methodThe Childhood Oxford-Liverpool Inventory of Feelings and Experiences (CO-LIFE) was created as a dimensional, parent-report measure of schizotypal and psychotic traits in the general population. Parents of 2,786 children also self-reported on an adapted version of the Oxford-Liverpool Inventory of Feelings and Experiences (O-LIFE-US).

resultsThe CO-LIFE resulted in continuous distributions for the total score and for each of three factor analytically-derived subscales. Item response theory (IRT) analyses indicated strong reliability across the score range for the O-LIFE-US and the CO-LIFE. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were high across all scales. Parent-child intraclass correlations were consistent with high heritability. The scales discriminated participants who reported a lifetime psychiatric diagnosis from those who reported no diagnosis. The O-LIFE-US and CO-LIFE scores correlated positively with the Social Responsiveness Scale 2 (SRS-2) indicating good convergent validity.

conclusionsLike the original O-LIFE, the O-LIFE-US and the CO-LIFE are valid and reliable tools that reflect the spectrum of psychiatric and schizotypal traits in the general population. Such scales are necessary for conducting family studies that aim to examine a range of psychological and behavioral traits in both children and adults and are well-suited for the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative of the NIMH.

Indexed as

Child of Impaired ParentsParentsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychotic DisordersReproducibility of ResultsDimensional psychiatric traitsparent-child psychiatric traitsschizotypy in children

Identifiers

PMID29083029
PMCPMC6427825
OpenAlexW2766519713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.