Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29082472›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2018

An impact assessment for urban stormwater use.

Lian Lundy, Michael Revitt, Bryan Ellis

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Feasibility of rainwater harvesting for sustainable water management in urban areas of Egypt.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020
    Article
  3. Assessment of surface water quality in Lushan: a world heritage sites in China.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lian LundyUrban Pollution Research Centre, Middlesex University, The Burroughs, Hendon, London, NW4 4BT, UK. L.Lundy@mdx.ac.uk.
Michael RevittUrban Pollution Research Centre, Middlesex University, The Burroughs, Hendon, London, NW4 4BT, UK.
Bryan EllisUrban Pollution Research Centre, Middlesex University, The Burroughs, Hendon, London, NW4 4BT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stormwater has the potential to provide a non-potable water supply which requires less treatment than municipal wastewaters with the added benefit of reducing pollution and erosion issues in receiving water bodies. However, the adoption of stormwater collection and use as an accepted practice requires that the perceived risks, particularly those associated with public health, are addressed. This paper considers the human health concerns associated with stormwater quality when used for a range of non-potable applications using E. coli, a commonly found pollutant in urban stormwater which is also widely included in human health-based water quality standards and guidelines. Based on a source-pathway-receptor model, scores are allocated, on a scale of 0 to 5, to benchmark increasing the likelihoods of exposure to stormwater during different occupational and non-occupational applications and magnitude of impacts which may result. The impacts are assessed by comparing median stormwater E. coli levels with the reported guideline levels relating to different stormwater uses. Combination of the exposure and impact scores provides an overall risk score for each stormwater application. Low or medium risks are shown to be associated with most stormwater uses except for domestic car washing and occupational irrigation of edible raw food crops where the predicted highest levels of risk posed by median E. coli levels in stormwater necessitate the introduction of remedial actions.

Indexed as

Conservation of Water ResourcesEnvironmentRainCitiesEnvironmental MonitoringEscherichia coliHumansRisk AssessmentWastewaterWater QualityWastewaterE. coliNon-potable usesPublic healthRisk-ratingStormwater collectionWater quality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.