Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29082429›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2018

Improving body fluid identification in forensic trace evidence-construction of an immunochromatographic test array to rapidly detect up to five body fluids simultaneously.

Hannah Holtkötter, Kristina Schwender, Peter Wiegand, Heidi Peiffer, Marielle Vennemann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Use of Lateral Flow Assays in Forensics.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hannah HoltkötterInstitute of Legal Medicine, University of Münster, Röntgenstraße 23, 48149, Münster, Germany. hannah.holtkoetter@ukmuenster.de.
Kristina SchwenderInstitute of Legal Medicine, University of Münster, Röntgenstraße 23, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Peter WiegandInstitute of Legal Medicine, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Heidi PeifferInstitute of Legal Medicine, University of Münster, Röntgenstraße 23, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Marielle VennemannInstitute of Legal Medicine, University of Münster, Röntgenstraße 23, 48149, Münster, Germany.
University of Münster · DEUniversität Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Body fluid identification is a substantial part of forensic trace analyses. The correct determination of the origin of a biological stain may give valuable information regarding the circumstances of a crime. A simple way to detect a body fluid in a stain is the use of immunochromatographic strip tests. They are easy to use, user-independent, quick, and cheap. Currently, however, it is only possible to analyze one body fluid at a time, requiring the analyst to make previous, possibly subjective, assumptions on the body fluid at hand. Also, identification of mixed body fluids requires the use of several tests, which results in additional sample and time consumption. To combine a simple approach with the possibility to simultaneously detect several body fluids, we constructed a combined immunochromatographic strip test array based on commercially available tests. The array rapidly detects up to five body fluids with a single analysis, and allowing for subsequent DNA extraction from the same material. With this test it was possible to identify the components of a mixture, the test was easily incorporated into standard laboratory work, and its sensitivity and specificity were shown to be comparable to those of conventional strip tests.

Indexed as

Blood Chemical AnalysisChromatography, AffinityAmylasesAntibodiesDNA FingerprintingFemaleFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation ProductsForensic MedicineHemoglobinsHumansMaleMenstruationMicrosatellite RepeatsSalivaSemenSeminal Vesicle Secretory ProteinsAmylasesAntibodiesFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Productsfibrin fragment DHemoglobinsSeminal Vesicle Secretory Proteinsseminal vesicle-specific antigenUromodulinBody fluid identificationImmunochromatographic assay

Identifiers

PMID29082429
OpenAlexW2765341339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.