Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29082379›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of breast health2017

Roles of Biopsychosocial Factors in the Development of Breast Cancer.

Mine Özkan, Nazmiye Yıldırım, Rian Dişçi, Ahmet Serkan İlgün, Dauren Sarsenov, Gül Alço, Fatma Aktepe, Nesiba Kalyoncu, Filiz İzci, Derya Selamoğlu and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of breast health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Psychological Stress and Cellular Aging in Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effects of Marital Status on Prognosis in Women with Infiltrating Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast: A Real-World 1: 1 Propensity-Matched Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Mine ÖzkanDepartment of Consultation Liaison Psychiatry, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Nazmiye YıldırımDepartment of Consultation Liaison Psychiatry, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Rian DişçiDepartment of Public Health, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Ahmet Serkan İlgünBreast Health Center, İstanbul Florence Nightingale Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Dauren SarsenovBreast Health Center, İstanbul Florence Nightingale Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Gül AlçoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, İstanbul Bilim University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Fatma AktepeDepartment of Pathology, Gayrettepe Florence Nightingale Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Nesiba KalyoncuDepartment of Consultation Liaison Psychiatry, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Filiz İzciDepartment of Psychiatry, İstanbul Bilim University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Derya SelamoğluDepartment of General Surgery, İstanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Çetin OrduRadiation Oncology Center, Gayrettepe Florence Nightingale Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Kezban Nur PilancıDepartment of Medical Oncology, İstanbul Haseki Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Zeynep İyigün ErdoğanPhysical Therapy and Rehabilitation Center, İstanbul Florence Nightingale Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Yeşim EralpDepartment of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Vahit ÖzmenDepartment of General Surgery, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to determine the roles of biopsychosocial risk factors in the development of breast cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis hospital-based case-control study included 491 women with breast cancer (study group) and 512 women who did not have cancer or other serious diseases (control group). Biological, psychological, and social risk factors were compared between the two groups. Data were collected using the semi-structured interview, the Stress Assessment Form, and the Coping Strategy Indicator to assess these factors.

resultsWhen the significantly different biopsychosocial variables between the study and the control groups were evaluated together, independent breast cancer risk factors were found as follows: a stressor experienced in the last 5 years, age 40 years and older, inadequate social support perception, use of avoidance coping strategy, being a housewife, having a family history of cancer, and having a body mass index ≥25.

conclusionThis study showed a relationship between breast cancer risk and manageable variables (obesity, stressor and coping strategy, social support, and employment status), age and family history of cancer, which are biopsychosocial factors. Biopsychosocial aspects are becoming a greater part of many different healthcare systems.

Indexed as

Breast cancercopingpsychosocial stressrisk factorssocial support

Identifiers

PMID29082379
PMCPMC5648278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.