ArticleEuropean journal of breast health2017
The Effects of Training on Knowledge and Beliefs About Breast Cancer and Early Diagnosis Methods Among Women.
Article in European journal of breast health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effectiveness of Educational Interventions on Breast Cancer Screening Uptake, Knowledge, and Beliefs among Women: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Pooled it
- Trial
- Trial
- The Effect of Counseling on Breast Cancer Awareness in Rural Iranian Women: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2019Trial
- Bridging the Gap Between Awareness and Practice in Breast Cancer Screening: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of Video Health Education on Breast Cancer Awareness and Self-Examination in the New Age of Digitalisation: Community-Based Evidence from a Developing Nation.European journal of breast health · 2026Article
- Assessment of skills among women of reproductive age group trained in breast self-examination: A quasiexperimental study.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Article
- Knowledge and beliefs on breast cancer screening and uptake among Yemeni female school teachers in Malaysia.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- The effectiveness of educational intervention based on the Health Action Model (HAM) in improving breast cancer screening behaviors.BMC women's health · 2024Article
- Breast cancer knowledge among health professionals: A pre-post-knowledge-based intervention study.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Breast Self-examination Training in Turkish Women Living in Northwestern Turkey.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2022Article
- Effect of breast cancer education based on the health belief model on knowledge, health belief, and breast self-examination among female students of Debre Markos University, Northwest Ethiopia, in 2021.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Effectiveness of An Educational Intervention of Breast Cancer Screening Practices Uptake, Knowledge, and Beliefs among Yemeni Female School Teachers in Klang Valley, Malaysia: A Study Protocol for a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Around Breast Cancer and Mammography Screening Among Jordanian Women.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2020Article
- The relationship of socio-demographic characteristics and knowledge of breast cancer on stage of behavioral adoption of breast self-examination.AIMS public health · 2020Article
- Educational Study to Increase Breast Cancer Knowledge Level and Scanning Participation among Women Working at a University.European journal of breast health · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveBreast cancer (BC) is the most common female malignancy in the world and Turkey. Its prevalence and mortality are surprisingly increasing at a rapid rate. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of training sessions on women's knowledge of relevant risk factors of BC and screening methods, screening behaviors and health beliefs among of healthy women in Turkey. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this study, in order to establish the efficiency of BC training, a semi-empirical single group pre-test & post-test research model was used. The data were collected by using a self-administered questionnaire and by using the Turkish version of Champion's health belief model scale (CHBMS). The pre-test was performed before the training and after one week of the training, post-test was performed with a questionnaire having the same content.
resultsIn total, 244 women participated in the study. The average age of the women was 39.44 (SD=1.06) years. The mean total knowledge score increased significantly (p<.001) from 9.05 in the pre-test to 16.53 in the post-test. The results showed that both mean knowledge scores and CHBMS subscales scores of the women were increased significantly (p<.001) from the pre-test to the post-test. In multiple linear regression analysis, BC screening knowledge of women with susceptibility, benefit, self-efficacy and health motivation subscales of CHBMS, breast self-examination (BSE) practice and self-efficacy were also significant in the post-test; in the pre- and post-tests, a significant relationship among the level of education of women, susceptibility and seriousness was found (p<.001).
conclusionThe study showed that the training program had profound effects on BC knowledge, screening behaviors and health beliefs of women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.