ArticleInternational journal of reproductive biomedicine2017
Frequency of
Article in International journal of reproductive biomedicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetics and molecular biology of male infertility among Iranian population: an update.American journal of translational research · 2021Review
- Unraveling the dark matter, long non-coding RNAs, in male reproductive diseases: A narrative review.International journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2020Review
- Genetic Landscape of Nonobstructive Azoospermia and New Perspectives for the Clinic.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTumor necrosis factor-alpha (
objectiveThe aim of this study is to determine the association of MATERIALS AND
methodsThis case-control study included 108 azoospermic and 119 fertile men. This research investigated the frequency of
resultsAccording to the present study, GG and AG genotypes frequency in the azoospermic men group were higher than the control group (OR= 2.298 (1.248-4.229), p=0.007), (OR=1.47 (0.869-2.498, p=0.149). Our findings also showed that G allele frequency in azoospermic men had significant difference compared to the control group (OR=2.302 (1.580-3.355), p<0.001).
conclusionIt seems that the GG genotype and G allele have an association with increased risk of non-obstructive azoospermia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29082371PMC5653914W2755250141What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.