ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2017
Atrial fibrillation trial to evaluate real-world procedures for their utility in helping to lower stroke events (AFTER-PULSE): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02578979 (Serial Electrocardiogram Versus Holter to Detect Atrial Fibrillation in Elderly Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Serial Electrocardiogram Versus Holter to Detect Atrial Fibrillation in Elderly Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: Study Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Atrial fibrillation trial to evaluate real-world procedures for their utility in helping to lower stroke events: A randomized clinical trial.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2021Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEnhancing detection of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF) in hospitalized patients with a recent ischemic stroke is important because of the treatment implications; especially since presence of paroxysmal AF may not be picked up in a single 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) test. While several trials have shown improved detection of AF with prolonged ECG monitoring, this strategy is associated with relatively high cost, labor intensity, and patient inconvenience, thereby making it challenging to routinely implement in all hospitals. Fortunately, conventional 24-h Holter monitoring and repeated 12-lead ECGs are readily available to detect paroxysmal AF in all hospitals, but is unclear which is the better strategy for evaluating undiagnosed AF. The objective of his study is to conduct a randomized trial of serial 12-lead ECGs vs. 24-hour Holter monitoring in the detection of AF in ischemic stroke patients without known AF. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We plan to enroll 1200 participants from six hospitals in Taiwan. Patients will be eligible for enrollment if they are admitted for an acute ischemic stroke within 2 days, are ≥65 years of age, and have no known AF by history or on baseline ECG at admission. We will randomly assign participants in a 1:1 ratio to undergo daily 12-lead ECG once daily for 5 days (intervention group) or 24-h Holter monitoring (control group). Primary outcome is newly detected AF on a 12-lead ECG or AF lasting ≥30 s on Holter monitoring. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02578979.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.