Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29082124›Full record

ReviewJournal of micro-bio robotics2016

Frontiers of robotic endoscopic capsules: a review.

Gastone Ciuti, R Caliò, D Camboni, L Neri, F Bianchi, A Arezzo, A Koulaouzidis, S Schostek, D Stoyanov, C M Oddo and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of micro-bio robotics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Trends, Technologies, and Key Challenges in Smart and Connected Healthcare.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Gastone CiutiThe BioRobotics Institute of Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Pisa 56025 Italy.
R CaliòThe BioRobotics Institute of Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Pisa 56025 Italy.
D CamboniThe BioRobotics Institute of Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Pisa 56025 Italy.
L NeriThe BioRobotics Institute of Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Pisa 56025 Italy.
F BianchiThe BioRobotics Institute of Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Pisa 56025 Italy.
A ArezzoDepartment of Surgical Disciplines, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
A KoulaouzidisEndoscopy Unit, The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
S SchostekOvesco Endoscopy AG, Tübingen, Germany.
D StoyanovCentre for Medical Image Computing and the Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK.
C M OddoThe BioRobotics Institute of Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Pisa 56025 Italy.
B MagnaniEkymed S.r.l., Livorno, Italy.
A MenciassiThe BioRobotics Institute of Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Pisa 56025 Italy.
M MorinoDepartment of Surgical Disciplines, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
M O SchurrOvesco Endoscopy AG, Tübingen, Germany.
P DarioThe BioRobotics Institute of Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Pisa 56025 Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digestive diseases are a major burden for society and healthcare systems, and with an aging population, the importance of their effective management will become critical. Healthcare systems worldwide already struggle to insure quality and affordability of healthcare delivery and this will be a significant challenge in the midterm future. Wireless capsule endoscopy (WCE), introduced in 2000 by Given Imaging Ltd., is an example of disruptive technology and represents an attractive alternative to traditional diagnostic techniques. WCE overcomes conventional endoscopy enabling inspection of the digestive system without discomfort or the need for sedation. Thus, it has the advantage of encouraging patients to undergo gastrointestinal (GI) tract examinations and of facilitating mass screening programmes. With the integration of further capabilities based on microrobotics, e.g. active locomotion and embedded therapeutic modules, WCE could become the key-technology for GI diagnosis and treatment. This review presents a research update on WCE and describes the state-of-the-art of current endoscopic devices with a focus on research-oriented robotic capsule endoscopes enabled by microsystem technologies. The article also presents a visionary perspective on WCE potential for screening, diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic procedures.

Indexed as

Digestive endoscopyMedical robotsMicrosystem technologiesRobotic endoscopic capsulesWireless capsule endoscopy (WCE)

Identifiers

PMID29082124
PMCPMC5646258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.