ArticleBiomedical optics express2017
Automated segmentation and quantification of airway mucus with endobronchial optical coherence tomography.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Asthma endotypes and theratypes.Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2026Review
- Detection of Airway Remodeling in Asthma Using Bronchoscopic Optical Coherence Tomography.CHEST pulmonary · 2025Article
- Innate Immunity and Asthma Exacerbations: Insights From Human Models.Immunological reviews · 2025Review
- Rapid non-destructive volumetric tumor yield assessment in fresh lung core needle biopsies using polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
- In vivo assessment of changes to canine airway smooth muscle following bronchial thermoplasty with OR-OCT.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2021Article
- Quantitative assessment of airway remodelling and response to allergen in asthma.Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2019Article
- Dynamic programming and automated segmentation of optical coherence tomography images of the neonatal subglottis: enabling efficient diagnostics to manage subglottic stenosis.Journal of biomedical optics · 2019Article
- Distinguishing Tumor from Associated Fibrosis to Increase Diagnostic Biopsy Yield with Polarization-Sensitive Optical Coherence Tomography.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2019Article
- In vivo detection of endotracheal tube biofilms in intubated critical care patients using catheter-based optical coherence tomography.Journal of biophotonics · 2019Article
- Automatic three-dimensional segmentation of endoscopic airway OCT images.Biomedical optics express · 2019Article
- Endoscopic Optical Coherence Tomography for Assessing Inhalation Airway Injury: A Technical Review.Otolaryngology (Sunnyvale, Calif.) · 2019Article
- Advances in Optical Coherence Tomography and Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy in Pulmonary Diseases.Respiration; international review of thoracic diseasesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We propose a novel suite of algorithms for automatically segmenting the airway lumen and mucus in endobronchial optical coherence tomography (OCT) data sets, as well as a novel approach for quantifying the contents of the mucus. Mucus and lumen were segmented using a robust, multi-stage algorithm that requires only minimal input regarding sheath geometry. The algorithm performance was highly accurate in a wide range of airway and noise conditions. Mucus was classified using mean backscattering intensity and grey level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) statistics. We evaluated our techniques in vivo in asthmatic and non-asthmatic volunteers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.