Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29082000›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2017

Leaving no one behind: lessons on rebuilding health systems in conflict- and crisis-affected states.

Tim Martineau, Barbara McPake, Sally Theobald, Joanna Raven, Tim Ensor, Suzanne Fustukian, Freddie Ssengooba, Yotamu Chirwa, Sreytouch Vong, Haja Wurie and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Tim MartineauDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Barbara McPakeNossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Sally TheobaldDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Joanna RavenDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Tim EnsorNuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Suzanne FustukianInstitute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK.
Freddie SsengoobaDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management at the School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Yotamu ChirwaCentre for International Health Policy, Biomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Sreytouch VongIndependent Consultant, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Haja WurieDepartment of Biochemistry, College of Medicine and Applied Health Sciences, University of Sierra Leone, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Nick HootonDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Sophie WitterInstitute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conflict and fragility are increasing in many areas of the world. This context has been referred to as the 'new normal' and affects a billion people. Fragile and conflict-affected states have the worst health indicators and the weakest health systems. This presents a major challenge to achieving universal health coverage. The evidence base for strengthening health systems in these contexts is very weak and hampered by limited research capacity, challenges relating to insecurity and apparent low prioritisation of this area of research by funders. This article reports on findings from a multicountry consortium examining health systems rebuilding post conflict/crisis in Sierra Leone, Zimbabwe, northern Uganda and Cambodia. Across the ReBUILD consortium's interdisciplinary research programme, three cross-cutting themes have emerged through our analytic process: communities, human resources for health and institutions. Understanding the impact of conflict/crisis on the intersecting inequalities faced by households and communities is essential for developing responsive health policies. Health workers demonstrate resilience in conflict/crisis, yet need to be supported post conflict/crisis with appropriate policies related to deployment and incentives that ensure a fair balance across sectors and geographical distribution. Postconflict/crisis contexts are characterised by an influx of multiple players and efforts to support coordination and build strong responsive national and local institutions are critical. The ReBUILD evidence base is starting to fill important knowledge gaps, but further research is needed to support policy makers and practitioners to develop sustainable health systems, without which disadvantaged communities in postconflict and postcrisis contexts will be left behind in efforts to promote universal health coverage.

Indexed as

genderhealth economicshealth policyhealth systemshuman resources for health

Identifiers

PMID29082000
PMCPMC5656126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.