ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2017
Measurements of Corneal Thickness in Eyes with Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome: Comparative Study of Different Image Processing Protocols.
Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bulbar Conjunctival Thickness in Eyes with Pseudoexfoliation Measured by Anterior Segment OCT.Journal of ophthalmic & vision research · 2025Article
- Corneal and anterior segment parameters in patients with clinically unilateral pseudoexfoliation syndrome.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2024Article
- Exploring association between pseudoexfoliation syndrome and ocular aging.International ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Lesion segmentation in breast ultrasound images using the optimized marked watershed method.Biomedical engineering online · 2021Article
- Elaboration of a multimodal MRI-based radiomics signature for the preoperative prediction of the histological subtype in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.Biomedical engineering online · 2020Article
- A new method for detecting the outer corneal contour in images from an ultra-fast Scheimpflug camera.Biomedical engineering online · 2019Article
- Measurement and application of patient similarity in personalized predictive modeling based on electronic medical records.Biomedical engineering online · 2019Article
- Evaluation of corneal elastic modulus based on Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology.Biomedical engineering online · 2019Article
- Novel dynamic corneal response parameters in a practice use: a critical review.Biomedical engineering online · 2019Review
- Corneal Vibrations during Intraocular Pressure Measurement with an Air-Puff Method.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2018Review
- Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements in corneal edema using ultrasound pachymetry, Visante anterior-segment optical coherence tomography, Cirrus optical coherence tomography, and Pentacam Scheimpflug camera tomography.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeComparative analysis of central and peripheral corneal thickness in PEX patients using three different imaging systems: Pentacam-Scheimpflug device, time-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) Visante, and swept-source OCT Casia. MATERIALS AND
methods128 eyes of 80 patients with diagnosed PEX were examined and compared with 112 normal, non-PEX eyes of 72 cataract patients. The study parameters included 5 measured zones: central and 4 peripheral (superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal).
resultsThe mean CCT in eyes with PEX syndrome measured with all three instruments was thicker than that in normal eyes. Corneal thickness measurements in the PEX group were statistically significantly different between Pentacam and OCT Casia: central corneal thickness (
conclusionThe central corneal thickness in eyes with PEX syndrome measured with three different independent methods is higher than that in the non-PEX group, and despite variable peripheral corneal thickness, this one parameter is still crucial in intraocular pressure measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.