Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29081878›Full record

ArticleRural mental health2017

Depression, Smoking, and Ego-Centric Social Network Characteristics in Ohio Appalachian Women.

Jeffrey Lam, Bo Lu, Nate Doogan, Tiffany Thomson, Amy Ferketich, Electra D Paskett, Mary Ellen Wewers

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rural mental health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeffrey LamCollege of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Bo LuCollege of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Nate DooganCollege of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Tiffany ThomsonCollege of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Amy FerketichCollege of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Electra D PaskettCollege of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Mary Ellen WewersCollege of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

TRAINING AND CAREER DEVELOPMENTP50CA105632 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WEGHORST, CHRISTOPHER M · 2003 to 2016
$17.2M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA105632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depression is a serious, costly, and debilitating disorder that is understudied in rural women. Studies show that depression is associated with low social integration and support, but few studies investigate the relationship between depression and social network characteristics. This study examined the associations among women from three Ohio Appalachian counties enrolled in a health study, which aimed to collect information for a future social network smoking cessation intervention. An address-based sampling method was used to randomly select and recruit 404 women. A cross-sectional survey and interview were used to collect information about demographic, psychosocial, behavioral factors, and ego-centric social network characteristics, which are variables derived from an individual (ego) and her first degree contacts (alters). The CES-D scale assessed depressive symptoms. A multivariable logistic regression analysis described the association between these factors and participants with depression (defined as CES-D≥16). Higher network density, or greater number of relationships among alters divided by the total amount of alters, reduced the risk for depression (OR = 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-0.95). Additionally, women with a high percentage of smoking alters were at greater risk for depression (OR = 1.19, 95% CI 1.02-1.39). Other factors associated with risk for depression included perceived stress score (OR = 1.34, 95% CI 1.24-1.45), loneliness score (OR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.05-1.80), and days with poor physical health (OR = 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.11). Findings suggest that psychosocial factors and social networks should be considered when addressing depression in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AppalachiaDepressionmental healthsocial network characteristics

Identifiers

PMID29081878
PMCPMC5658011
OpenAlexW2625674288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.