ReviewFrontiers in plant science2017
Finger on the Pulse: Pumping Iron into Chickpea.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Strategies and bibliometric analysis of legumes biofortification to address malnutrition.Planta · 2024Review
- Iron accumulation and partitioning in hydroponically grown wild and cultivated chickpea (Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Escalate protein plates from legumes for sustainable human nutrition.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Review
- Effect of Drought and Low P on Yield and Nutritional Content in Common Bean.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Review
- Biofortification of Cereals and Pulses Using New Breeding Techniques: Current and Future Perspectives.Frontiers in nutrition · 2021Review
- Characterization of pea seed nutritional value within a diverse population of Pisum sativum.PloS one · 2021Article
- Effects of Interspecific Chromosome Substitution in Upland Cotton on Cottonseed Micronutrients.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Nutrient enhancement of chickpea grown with plant growth promoting bacteria in local soil of Bathinda, Northwestern India.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2019Article
- Biochemical diversity evaluation in chickpea accessions employing mini-core collection.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Iron deficiency is a major problem in both developing and developed countries, and much of this can be attributed to insufficient dietary intake. Over the past decades several measures, such as supplementation and food fortification, have helped to alleviate this problem. However, their associated costs limit their accessibility and effectiveness, particularly amongst the financially constrained. A more affordable and sustainable option that can be implemented alongside existing measures is biofortification. To date, much work has been invested into staples like cereals and root crops-this has culminated in the successful generation of high iron-accumulating lines in rice and pearl millet. More recently, pulses have gained attention as targets for biofortification. Being secondary staples rich in protein, they are a nutritional complement to the traditional starchy staples. Despite the relative youth of this interest, considerable advances have already been made concerning the biofortification of pulses. Several studies have been conducted in bean, chickpea, lentil, and pea to assess existing germplasm for high iron-accumulating traits. However, little is known about the molecular workings behind these traits, particularly in a leguminous context, and biofortification via genetic modification (GM) remains to be attempted. This review examines the current state of the iron biofortification in pulses, particularly chickpea. The challenges concerning biofortification in pulses are also discussed. Specifically, the potential application of transgenic technology is explored, with focus on the genes that have been successfully used in biofortification efforts in rice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.