Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29081785›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2017

Finger on the Pulse: Pumping Iron into Chickpea.

Grace Z H Tan, Sudipta S Das Bhowmik, Thi M L Hoang, Mohammad R Karbaschi, Alexander A T Johnson, Brett Williams, Sagadevan G Mundree

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Nutrient enhancement of chickpea grown with plant growth promoting bacteria in local soil of Bathinda, Northwestern India.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2019
    Article
  10. Biochemical diversity evaluation in chickpea accessions employing mini-core collection.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Grace Z H TanCentre for Tropical Crops and Biocommodities, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Sudipta S Das BhowmikCentre for Tropical Crops and Biocommodities, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Thi M L HoangCentre for Tropical Crops and Biocommodities, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Mohammad R KarbaschiCentre for Tropical Crops and Biocommodities, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Alexander A T JohnsonSchool of Biosciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Brett WilliamsCentre for Tropical Crops and Biocommodities, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Sagadevan G MundreeCentre for Tropical Crops and Biocommodities, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Queensland University of Technology · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Iron deficiency is a major problem in both developing and developed countries, and much of this can be attributed to insufficient dietary intake. Over the past decades several measures, such as supplementation and food fortification, have helped to alleviate this problem. However, their associated costs limit their accessibility and effectiveness, particularly amongst the financially constrained. A more affordable and sustainable option that can be implemented alongside existing measures is biofortification. To date, much work has been invested into staples like cereals and root crops-this has culminated in the successful generation of high iron-accumulating lines in rice and pearl millet. More recently, pulses have gained attention as targets for biofortification. Being secondary staples rich in protein, they are a nutritional complement to the traditional starchy staples. Despite the relative youth of this interest, considerable advances have already been made concerning the biofortification of pulses. Several studies have been conducted in bean, chickpea, lentil, and pea to assess existing germplasm for high iron-accumulating traits. However, little is known about the molecular workings behind these traits, particularly in a leguminous context, and biofortification via genetic modification (GM) remains to be attempted. This review examines the current state of the iron biofortification in pulses, particularly chickpea. The challenges concerning biofortification in pulses are also discussed. Specifically, the potential application of transgenic technology is explored, with focus on the genes that have been successfully used in biofortification efforts in rice.

Indexed as

chickpeacrop improvementgenetic modificationironpulse biofortification

Identifiers

PMID29081785
PMCPMC5646179
OpenAlexW2761312646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.