ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2017
Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global prevalence of Giardia infection in nonhuman mammalian hosts: A systematic review and meta-analysis of five million animals.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Pooled it
- A Global Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Giardia duodenalis in Rabbits: Epidemiology, Genetic Diversity and Possible Zoonotic Concerns.Veterinary medicine and science · 2025Pooled it
- Gut protozoa of wild rodents - a meta-analysis.Parasitology · 2024Pooled it
- A 'One Health' perspective of Africa-wide distribution and prevalence of Giardia species in humans, animals and waterbodies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Parasitology · 2023Pooled it
- Global epidemiology of Giardia duodenalis infection in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International health · 2022Pooled it
- Giardia spp., the most ubiquitous protozoan parasite in Argentina: human, animal and environmental surveys reported in the last 40 years.Parasitology research · 2020Pooled it
- First joint report on the prevalence and genotyping of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis, and Enterocytozoon bieneusi among hospitalized children in Inner Mongolia, China.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Occurrence and Multi-Locus Genotyping ofVeterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Prevalence and molecular characterization ofFood and waterborne parasitology · 2025Article
- Investigation of Infection ofVeterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Occurrence and Multi-Locus Genotyping ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- A Multiplex PCR Assay for Simultaneous Detection ofVeterinary sciences · 2024Article
- Unveiling the presence and genotypic diversity of Giardia duodenalis on large-scale sheep farms: insights from the Henan and Ningxia Regions, China.Parasites & vectors · 2024Article
- Article
- Prevalence and Genetic Characterization ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Prevalence and assemblage identified of Giardia duodenalis in zoo and farmed Asiatic black bears (Ursus thibetanus) from the Heilongjiang and Fujian Provinces of China.Parasite (Paris, France) · 2024Article
- Occurrence and Genotypic Identification ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Article
- Potential Zoonotic Transmission ofTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2023Article
- First report of prevalence and assemblage analysis of Giardia duodenalis in pigs from Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, southern China.Parasite (Paris, France) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.