Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29081692›Full record

ArticleCurrent genomics2017

Complete Genome of

Jinhui Shen, Qian Cong, Dominika Borek, Zbyszek Otwinowski, Nick V Grishin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Butterfly taxa discovery via genomic analysis.The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey · 2026
    Article
  3. Notable Hesperiidae collected by Kilian Roever in Arizona, USA.The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Advancing butterfly systematics through genomic analysis.The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey · 2025
    Article
  6. Update to: Advancing butterfly systematics through genomic analysis.The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Update to: New butterfly taxa and findings from genomic analyses.The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey · 2025
    Article
  9. New butterfly taxa and findings from genomic analyses.The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey · 2025
    Article
  10. Taxonomic advances driven by the genomic analysis of butterflies.The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey · 2024
    Article
  11. New taxa of butterflies supported by genomic analysis.The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genomic analysis reveals new species and subspecies of butterflies.The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey · 2023
    Article
  16. Butterfly classification and species discovery using genomics.The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey · 2023
    Article
  17. Additional taxonomic refinements suggested by genomic analysis of butterflies.The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Taxonomic discoveries enabled by genomic analysis of butterflies.The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey · 2022
    Article
  20. Genomic DNA sequencing reveals two new North American species ofThe taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jinhui ShenDepartment of Biophysics and Biochemistry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, Texas75390-8816, USA.
Qian CongDepartment of Biophysics and Biochemistry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, Texas75390-8816, USA.
Dominika BorekDepartment of Biophysics and Biochemistry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, Texas75390-8816, USA.
Zbyszek OtwinowskiDepartment of Biophysics and Biochemistry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, Texas75390-8816, USA.
Nick V GrishinHoward Hughes Medical Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, Texas75390-9050, USA.

Funding

Computational methods for structural-functional studies of proteinsR01GM094575 · NIGMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI GRISHIN, NICK V. · 2010 to 2017
$2.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM094575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Hoary Edge Skipper (Achalarus lyciades) is an eastern North America endemic butterfly from the Eudaminae subfamily of skippers named for an underside whitish patch near the hindwing edge. Its caterpillars feed on legumes, in contrast to Grass skippers (subfamily Hesperiinae) which feed exclusively on monocots.

resultsTo better understand the evolution and phenotypic diversification of Skippers (family Hesperiidae), we sequenced, assembled and annotated a complete genome draft and transcriptome of a wild-caught specimen of A. lyciades and compared it with the available genome of the Clouded Skipper (Lerema accius) from the Grass skipper subfamily. The genome of A. lyciades is nearly twice the size of L. accius (567 Mbp vs. 298 Mbp), however it encodes a smaller number of proteins (15881 vs. 17411). Gene expansions we identified previously in L. accius apparently did not occur in the genome of A. lyciades. For instance, a family of hypothetical cellulases that diverged from an endochitinase (possibly associated with feeding of L. accius caterpillars on nutrient-poor grasses) is absent in A. lyciades. While L. accius underwent gene expansion in pheromone binding proteins, A. lyciades has more opsins. This difference may be related to the mate recognition mechanisms of the two species: visual cues might be more important for the Eudaminae skippers (which have more variable wing patterns), whereas odor might be more important for Grass skippers (that are hardly distinguishable by their wings). Phylogenetically, A. lyciades is a sister species of L. accius, the only other Hesperiidae with a complete genome.

conclusionsA new reference genome of a dicot-feeding skippers, the first from the Eudaminae subfamily, reveals its larger size and suggests hypotheses about phenotypic traits and differences from monocot-feeding skippers.

Indexed as

Achalarus lyciadesButterfliesCatalaseCellulaseLepidopteraOpsin

Identifiers

PMID29081692
PMCPMC5635620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.