ReviewCurrent genomics2017
Familial Colorectal Cancer Type X.
Review in Current genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Colorectal Cancer Screening in Hereditary and Familial High-Risk Populations: Best Practices and Future Directions.International journal of cancer · 2026Review
- Deficient Mismatch Repair and Microsatellite Instability in Solid Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Hereditary Colorectal Cancer: From Diagnosis to Surgical Options.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2025Review
- Inherited BRCA1 and RNF43 pathogenic variants in a familial colorectal cancer type X family.Familial cancer · 2024Article
- Germline gain-of-function MMP11 variant results in an aggressive form of colorectal cancer.International journal of cancer · 2023Article
- Whole exome sequencing identifies novel germline variants of SLC15A4 gene as potentially cancer predisposing in familial colorectal cancer.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2022Article
- Immunology of Lynch Syndrome.Current oncology reports · 2021Review
- Article
- Broadening risk profile in familial colorectal cancer type X; increased risk for five cancer types in the national Danish cohort.BMC cancer · 2020Article
- Colorectal Cancer in the Adolescent and Young Adult Population.JCO oncology practice · 2020Article
- Unsolicited information letters to increase awareness of Lynch syndrome and familial colorectal cancer: reactions and attitudes.Familial cancer · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The genetic background is unknown for the 50-60% of the HNPCC families, who fulfill the Amsterdam criteria, but do not have a mutation in an MMR gene, and is referred to as FCCTX. This study reviews the clinical, morphological and molecular characteristics of FCCTX, and discusses the molecular genetic methods used to localize new FCCTX genes, along with an overview of the genes and chromosomal areas that possibly relate to FCCTX. FCCTX is a heterogeneous group, mainly comprising cases caused by single high-penetrance genes, or by multiple low-penetrance genes acting together, and sporadic CRC cases. FCCTX differs in clinical, morphological and molecular genetic characteristics compared to LS, including a later age of onset, distal location of tumours in the colon, lower risk of developing extracolonic tumours and a higher adenoma/carcinoma ratio, which indicates a slower progression to CRC. Certain characteristics are shared with sporadic CRC, e.g. similarities in gene expression and a high degree of CIN+, with significanly increased 20q gain in FCCTX. Other molecular characteristics of FCCTX include longer telomere length and hypomethylation of LINE-1, both being a possible explanation for CIN+. Some genes in FCCTX families (RPS20, BMPR1A, SEMA4A) have been identified by using a combination of linkage analysis and sequencing. Sequencing strategies and subsequent bioinformatics are improving fast. Exome sequencing and whole genome sequencing are currently the most promising tools. Finally, the involvement of CNV's and regulatory sequences are widely unexplored and would be interesting for further investigation in FCCTX.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.