Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29081670›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2017

Evaluation of the effectiveness and efficiency of the triage emergency department nursing protocol for the management of pain.

Loris Butti, Olga Bierti, Raffaela Lanfrit, Romina Bertolini, Sara Chittaro, Stefania Delli Compagni, Davide Del Russo, Rossella Letizia Mancusi, Franco Pertoldi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05230108 (Implementation of Advanced Triage in the Emergency Department of Bellvitge University Hospital), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05230108 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Implementation of Advanced Triage in the Emergency Department of Bellvitge University Hospital

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Universitari de BellvitgeRan2022 to 2025Enrolled547ConditionsNurse's Scope of PracticeArmsAdvanced Triage
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Loris ButtiS.O.C. Emergency Medicine, AAS3 Ospedale Sant'Antonio di San Daniele del Friuli.
Olga BiertiS.O.C. Emergency Medicine, AAS3 Ospedale Sant'Antonio di San Daniele del Friuli.
Raffaela LanfritS.O.C. Emergency Medicine, AAS3 Ospedale Sant'Antonio di San Daniele del Friuli.
Romina BertoliniS.O.C. Emergency Medicine, AAS3 Ospedale Sant'Antonio di San Daniele del Friuli.
Sara ChittaroS.O.C. Emergency Medicine, AAS3 Ospedale Sant'Antonio di San Daniele del Friuli.
Stefania Delli CompagniS.O.C. Emergency Medicine, AAS3 Ospedale Sant'Antonio di San Daniele del Friuli.
Davide Del RussoS.O.C. Emergency Medicine, AAS3 Ospedale Sant'Antonio di San Daniele del Friuli.
Rossella Letizia MancusiC.R.E.A. Sanità, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Franco PertoldiS.O.C. Emergency Medicine, AAS3 Ospedale Sant'Antonio di San Daniele del Friuli.
Ospedale Sant Antonio · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPain is a common symptom presented in the emergency department (ED) although it is often underestimated, poorly evaluated and treated. The application of a protocol for timely pain management ensured by the nurse can avoid the delays in the analgesic treatment and improve the patient's quality of waiting.

aimsTo check the effectiveness and efficiency of the protocol aimed at early pain management in triage, active in our ED. In particular, the response to analgesic treatment was evaluated 60 minutes after the administration and at discharge. Patient satisfaction was also evaluated using two anonymous questionnaires both at discharge and 48 hours later via telephone.

methodsA single-center, observational study was conducted on a prospective cohort of patients (aged ≥4 years) with a pain symptom at admission in ED with no surgical picture.

resultsIn the observation period (June 2015-May 2016), 382 patients were enrolled, and of these, 312 (84.8%) accepted pain therapy during triage stage in the ED. In 97.4% of the cases, orosoluble paracetamol 1000 mg was administered. In the re-evaluation done 60 minutes later, 65.9% of the patients showed a reduction of at least 2 points on Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), equal to a mean reduction of 2.24 points (95% CI: 2.03-2.45). The mean time of analgesia intake was equal to 5.9 minutes (95% CI: 3.8-8.1). In the re-evaluation done at discharge, 33.2% of the patients showed a reduction of NRS score >50%, leading to a mean reduction of 39% (95% CI: 35.3%-41.9%). The level of patient satisfaction was high with a mean value >9 points (maximum satisfaction =10).

conclusionThis protocol shows that optimal pain management was achieved by patients rapidly receiving an effective painkiller therapy at triage, leading to substantial patient satisfaction. In moderate pain, orosoluble paracetamol 1000 mg provided a reduction of NRS score by 2 points in 67.6% of the patients, confirming to be the analgesic of choice in ED.

Indexed as

analgesicorosoluble paracetamolpain managementprotocoltriage

Identifiers

PMID29081670
PMCPMC5652903
OpenAlexW2765402728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.