Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29081664›Full record

ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2017

Impact of prior therapies on everolimus activity: an exploratory analysis of RADIANT-4.

Roberto Buzzoni, Carlo Carnaghi, Jonathan Strosberg, Nicola Fazio, Simron Singh, Fabian Herbst, Antonia Ridolfi, Marianne E Pavel, Edward M Wolin, Juan W Valle and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01524783 (A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Phase III Study of Everolimus), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01524783 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Phase III Study of Everolimus (RAD001) Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care in the Treatment of Patients With Advanced NET of GI or Lung Origin

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovartis PharmaceuticalsRan2012 to 2020Enrolled302ConditionsAdvanced NET of GI Origin, Advanced NET of Lung Origin, Neuroendocrine TumorsArmsEverolimus, Placebo, Best suportive care (BSC)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 13 institutions in 9 countries.

Roberto BuzzoniIRCCS Foundation, National Institute of Tumors, Milan, Italy.
Carlo CarnaghiHumanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Italy.
Jonathan StrosbergMoffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Nicola FazioEuropean Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Simron SinghSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Fabian HerbstNovartis AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Antonia RidolfiNovartis Pharma S.A.S., Rueil-Malmaison, France.
Marianne E PavelMedizinische Klinik 1, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Edward M WolinMontefiore Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY, USA.
Juan W ValleInstitute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, The Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Do-Youn OhSeoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
James C YaoUniversity of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Rodney PommierOregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEHumanitas University · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITNovartis (France) · FRNovartis (Switzerland) · CHOregon Health & Science University · USSeoul National University · KRSunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, everolimus was shown to improve median progression-free survival (PFS) by 7.1 months in patients with advanced, progressive, well-differentiated, nonfunctional neuroendocrine tumors (NET) of lung or gastrointestinal (GI) tract compared with placebo (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.35-0.67;

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01524783. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients were randomized (2:1) to everolimus 10 mg/day or placebo, both with best supportive care. Subgroups of patients who received prior SSA, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy (including peptide receptor radionuclide therapy) were analyzed and reported.

resultsA total of 302 patients were enrolled, of whom, 163 (54%) had any prior SSA use (mostly for tumor control), 77 (25%) received chemotherapy, and 63 (21%) were previously exposed to radiotherapy. Patients who received everolimus had longer median PFS compared with placebo, regardless of previous SSA (with SSA: 11.1 vs 4.5 months [HR, 0.56 {95% CI, 0.37-0.85}]; without SSA: 9.5 vs 3.7 months [0.57 {0.36-0.89}]), chemotherapy (with chemotherapy: 9.2 vs 2.1 months [0.35 {0.19-0.64}]; without chemotherapy: 11.2 vs 5.4 months [0.60 {0.42-0.86}]), or radiotherapy (with radiotherapy: 9.2 vs 3.0 months [0.47 {0.24-0.94}]; without radiotherapy: 11 vs 5.1 months [0.59 {0.42-0.83}]) exposure. The most frequent drug-related adverse events included stomatitis (59%-65%), fatigue (27%-35%), and diarrhea (24%-34%) among the subgroups.

conclusionThese results suggest that everolimus improves PFS in patients with advanced, progressive lung or GI NET, regardless of prior therapies. Safety findings were consistent with the known safety profile of everolimus in NET.

Indexed as

chemotherapyneuroendocrine tumorsprogression-free survivalPRRTsomatostatin analogs

Identifiers

PMID29081664
PMCPMC5652899
OpenAlexW2736563947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.