ArticleCognitive development2017
Neurodynamic correlates of response inhibition from emerging to mid adulthood.
Article in Cognitive development, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Using mindfulness-based intervention to promote executive function in young children: a multivariable and multiscale sample entropy study.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Trial
- Too young for medication? prescriber perspectives on how age shapes medication for opioid use disorder prescribing in transition-age adults.Harm reduction journal · 2026Article
- A comprehensive study of cognitive control in healthy aging.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Alterations of NoGo P300 ERP in schizophrenia in social setting: a hyperscanning study.Translational psychiatry · 2025Article
- Unveiling alcohol bias and impaired inhibitory control in young binge drinkers: insights from the alcohol hayling task.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- White Matter Differences in Early-Stage Alcohol Use Disorder: Diffusion Tensor and Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Measures of Structural Integrity.Addiction biology · 2025Article
- Temporal Course of Interference Control from Early to Late Young Adulthood: An ERP Study.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Differences in the Efficiency of Cognitive Control across Young Adulthood: An ERP Perspective.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Immature event-related alpha dynamics in children compared with the young adults during inhibition shown by day-night stroop task.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- The "when" and "where" of the interplay between attentional capture and response inhibition during a Go/NoGo variant.NeuroImage · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Response inhibition, a key executive function, continues to develop in early adulthood in parallel with maturational processes of the underlying prefrontal regions known to support it. The current study examined behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of response inhibition during a visual Go/No-Go task in a large sample (N = 120) comprised of participants in their Early 20s (ages 19-21), Mid 20s (ages 23-27), and Early 30s (ages 28-42). The two younger groups had lower accuracy, shorter reaction times, and made more premature responses compared to Early 30s. These impulsive behavioral tendencies were reflected in a delayed N2 latency and reduced P2 and P3 amplitudes for Early 20s compared to Early 30s and were associated with personality traits such as impulsivity in an age-dependent manner. The results suggest that response inhibition may not develop fully before the approximate age of 25, as the refinement of the primarily prefrontal cognitive control network follows a protracted developmental trajectory throughout young adulthood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.