Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29081385›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2017

Toward multimodal signal detection of adverse drug reactions.

Rave Harpaz, William DuMouchel, Martijn Schuemie, Olivier Bodenreider, Carol Friedman, Eric Horvitz, Anna Ripple, Alfred Sorbello, Ryen W White, Rainer Winnenburg and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A Social Media Study on the Effects of Psychiatric Medication Use.Proceedings of the ... International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rave HarpazOracle Health Sciences, Bedford, MA, United States. Electronic address: rave.harpaz@oracle.com.
William DuMouchelOracle Health Sciences, Bedford, MA, United States.
Martijn SchuemieJanssen Research and Development, Titusville, NJ, United States.
Olivier BodenreiderNational Library of Medicine, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Carol FriedmanColumbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Eric HorvitzMicrosoft Research, Redmond, WA, United States.
Anna RippleNational Library of Medicine, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Alfred SorbelloU.S. FDA, Silver Spring, MD, United States.
Ryen W WhiteMicrosoft Research, Redmond, WA, United States.
Rainer WinnenburgStanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Nigam H ShahStanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.

Funding

Interpretable deep learning models for translational medicine RenewalR01LM012011 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Tanner J. Freeman, XINGHUA LU · 2015 to 2026
$3.6M
Drug terminology at NLM - Integration, dissemination, quality assurance and applicationsZIALM010007 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI BODENREIDER, OLIVIER · 2016 to 2020
$3.1M
Mining health data for drug safety profilesR01GM101430 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SHAH, NIGAM H · 2013 to 2017
$2.9M
FDA HHS U01 FD004979Intramural NIH HHS ZIA LM010007NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM101430NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveImproving mechanisms to detect adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is key to strengthening post-marketing drug safety surveillance. Signal detection is presently unimodal, relying on a single information source. Multimodal signal detection is based on jointly analyzing multiple information sources. Building on, and expanding the work done in prior studies, the aim of the article is to further research on multimodal signal detection, explore its potential benefits, and propose methods for its construction and evaluation. MATERIAL AND

methodsFour data sources are investigated; FDA's adverse event reporting system, insurance claims, the MEDLINE citation database, and the logs of major Web search engines. Published methods are used to generate and combine signals from each data source. Two distinct reference benchmarks corresponding to well-established and recently labeled ADRs respectively are used to evaluate the performance of multimodal signal detection in terms of area under the ROC curve (AUC) and lead-time-to-detection, with the latter relative to labeling revision dates.

resultsLimited to our reference benchmarks, multimodal signal detection provides AUC improvements ranging from 0.04 to 0.09 based on a widely used evaluation benchmark, and a comparative added lead-time of 7-22 months relative to labeling revision dates from a time-indexed benchmark.

conclusionsThe results support the notion that utilizing and jointly analyzing multiple data sources may lead to improved signal detection. Given certain data and benchmark limitations, the early stage of development, and the complexity of ADRs, it is currently not possible to make definitive statements about the ultimate utility of the concept. Continued development of multimodal signal detection requires a deeper understanding the data sources used, additional benchmarks, and further research on methods to generate and synthesize signals.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDatabases, FactualHumansUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAdverse drug reactionsDrug safetyMultimodalPharmacovigilanceSignal detection

Identifiers

PMID29081385
PMCPMC8502488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.