ArticleChronic respiratory disease2017
Health status of COPD patients undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation: A comparative responsiveness of the CAT and SGRQ.
Article in Chronic respiratory disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of Liuzijue in stable patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2020Pooled it
- Effects of exercise-based pulmonary rehabilitation on severe/very severe COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseasePooled it
- Effects of pulmonary-based Qigong exercise in stable patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized controlled trial.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2023Trial
- Evaluating an Intervention Program Using WeChat for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Trial
- Effectiveness of Yijinjing on cognitive and motor functions in patients with Parkinson's disease: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Minimally Important Difference of the 20-m 6-Minute Walk Test in Individuals With COPD.Respiratory care · 2023Article
- The Efficacy of Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Home based pulmonary tele-rehabilitation under telemedicine system for COPD: a cohort study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2022Article
- Establishing Quality of Life in Southern Taiwan COPD Patients Using Long-Acting Bronchodilator.Patient preference and adherence · 2022Article
- Article
- Effects of comprehensive and intensive pulmonary rehabilitation and nutritional support on quality of life and functional status in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Article
- Quantitative CT Analysis in Patients with Pulmonary Emphysema: Do Calculated Differences Between Full Inspiration and Expiration Correlate with Lung Function?International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2020Article
- Exercise Training in Patients with Chronic Respiratory Diseases: Are Cardiovascular Comorbidities and Outcomes Taken into Account?-A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
- Article
- Establishing a pulmonary rehabilitation programme in primary care in Greece: A FRESH AIR implementation study.Chronic respiratory diseaseArticle
- Minimal clinically important difference of 3-minute chair rise test and the DIRECT questionnaire after pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseObservational
- Efficacy of community-based respiratory neuromuscular electrical stimulation on exercise capacity and quality of life in stable COPD: a randomized multicenter parallel-controlled trial protocol.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment test (CAT) are the measures used to assess health status. This study aims to examine the responsiveness of these tools by severity of dyspnoea category in patients with COPD. Forty-nine COPD patients who underwent a 12-week pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programme were assessed at baseline, 12 weeks and at 28-week follow-up. Patients were categorized into two groups by severity of dyspnoea category (i.e. mild to moderate (modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) 1-2) and severe to very severe (mMRC 3-4)) using the mMRC dyspnoea scale. Effect size (ES) was computed as estimates of responsiveness. The SGRQ demonstrated greater responsiveness by total sample (SGRQ, ES = 0.87; CAT, ES = 0.75) and for the mMRC 3-4 category (SGRQ, ES = 0.91; CAT, ES = 0.76) on completion of PR. At 28-week follow-up, overall comparable responsiveness of the CAT and SGRQ was identified by total sample (SGRQ, ES = 0.75; CAT, ES = 0.74) and by severity of dyspnoea category. The symptom, impact and activity domains of the SGRQ showed good responsiveness, with greater ESs obtained overall for the mMRC 3-4 category. On completion of PR, the SGRQ demonstrates a greater responsiveness with COPD patients, especially in relation to the mMRC 3-4 category, while both the CAT and SGRQ show comparable responsiveness on follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.