Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29080941›Full record

ReviewSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2017

Social isolation in mental health: a conceptual and methodological review.

Jingyi Wang, Brynmor Lloyd-Evans, Domenico Giacco, Rebecca Forsyth, Cynthia Nebo, Farhana Mann, Sonia Johnson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 190 papers, 20 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
190citing papers in PubMed, 20 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

190 citing papers in PubMed, 20 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The invisible wall: experiences of social isolation in colorectal cancer patients with ostomy-a qualitative meta-synthesis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Interventions to identify and manage depression delivered by 'nontraditional' providers to community-dwelling older adults: A realist review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Pooled it
  11. Loneliness in autistic adults: A systematic review.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2022
    Pooled it
  12. Loneliness and the onset of new mental health problems in the general population.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2022
    Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

130 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jingyi WangDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Brynmor Lloyd-EvansDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK. b.lloyd-evans@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9866-788X
Domenico GiaccoUnit for Social and Community Psychiatry, (WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Services Development), Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Rebecca ForsythDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Cynthia NeboDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Farhana MannDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Sonia JohnsonDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.

Funding

NIHR School for Social Care Research C088/E-MR/BLE-M23Wellcome Trust 203618/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSocial isolation and related concepts have been discussed increasingly in the field of mental health. Despite this, there is a lack of conceptual clarity and consistency in the definition and operationalisation of these terms. This review aimed to provide a clear framework for social isolation and related concepts, and to identify well-established measures in the field of mental health for each conceptual domain discussed.

methodsWe used an iterative strategy of expert consultation and literature searching. A multi-disciplinary group of senior academics was consulted both before and after the literature searching to identify relevant terms, conceptual papers, or recommended measures. Our conceptual framework was also validated through expert consultation. We searched the Web of Science database using terms suggested by experts and subsequently identified further relevant studies through review articles and by reading full texts and reference lists of included studies. A narrative synthesis was conducted.

resultsWe developed a model with five domains incorporating all the concepts relevant to social isolation in regular use in the mental health research literature. These five domains are: social network-quantity; social network-structure; social network-quality; appraisal of relationships-emotional; and appraisal of relationships-resources. We also identified well-developed measures suitable for assessing each of the five conceptual domains or covering multi-domains.

conclusionsOur review proposes a conceptual model to encompass and differentiate all terms relating to social isolation. Potential uses are in allowing researchers and intervention developers to identify precisely the intended outcomes of interventions, and to choose the most appropriate measures to use in mental health settings.

Indexed as

Mental HealthHealth PromotionHumansModels, PsychologicalResearch DesignSocial IsolationTerminology as TopicConceptual modelLonelinessMeasuresMental healthSocial isolation

Identifiers

PMID29080941
PMCPMC5702385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.