Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29080931›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2018

Evaluation of a model to improve collection of blood cultures in patients with sepsis in the emergency room.

B Mariani, M Corbella, E Seminari, L Sacco, P Cambieri, F Capra Marzani, I F Martino, M A Bressan, A Muzzi, C Marena and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Daptomycin Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Patients on Methadone Substitution Therapy.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

B MarianiSC Microbiologia e Virologia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
M CorbellaSC Microbiologia e Virologia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
E SeminariClinica Malattie Infettive, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Golgi 2, 27100, Pavia, Italy. e.seminari@smatteo.pv.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5246-928X
L SaccoSC Microbiologia e Virologia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
P CambieriSC Microbiologia e Virologia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
F Capra MarzaniServizio di Anestesia e Rianimazione 1, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
I F MartinoPronto Soccorso, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
M A BressanPronto Soccorso, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
A MuzziSC Direzione Medica di Presidio, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
C MarenaSC Direzione Medica di Presidio, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
C TinelliSC Biometria e Statistica, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
P MaroneSC Microbiologia e Virologia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Policlinico San Matteo Fondazione · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis begins outside of the hospital for nearly 80% of patients and the emergency room (ER) represents the first contact with the health care system. This study evaluates a project to improve collection of blood cultures (BCs) in patients with sepsis in the ER consisting of staff education and completion of the appropriate BC pre-analytical phase. A retrospective observational study performed to analyse the data on BC collection in the ER before and after a three-phase project. The first phase (1 January to 30 June 2015) before the intervention consisted of evaluation of data on BCs routinely collected in the ER. The second phase (1 July to 31 December 2015) was the intervention phase in which educational courses on sepsis recognition and on pre-analytical phase procedures (including direct incubation) were provided to ER staff. The third phase (1 January to 30 June 2016; after the intervention) again consisted of evaluation. Before the intervention, out of 24,738 admissions to the ER, 103 patients (0.4%) were identified as septic and had BCs drawn (359 BC bottles); 19 out of 103 patients (18.4%) had positive BCs. After the intervention, out of 24,702 admissions, 313 patients (1.3%) had BCs drawn (1,242 bottles); of these, 96 (30.7%) had positive BCs. Comparing the first and third periods, an increase in the percentage of patients with BCs collected (from 0.4% to 1.3% respectively, p < 0.0001) and an increase in the percentages of patients with true-positive BCs (from 0.08% to 0.39% of all patients evaluated respectively, p < 0.0001) were observed. The isolation of bacteria by BCs increased 3.25-fold after project implementation. These results can be principally ascribed to an improved awareness of sepsis in the staff associated with improved pre-analytical phase procedures in BC collection.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalBacteremiaBacteriaBlood CultureHumansRetrospective StudiesSpecimen HandlingBlood cultureBloodstream infectionPre-analytical phaseSepsis

Identifiers

PMID29080931
OpenAlexW2765430854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.